Automated Benefit Verification System for Transaction Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for verifying customer benefits at the point of purchase are inefficient, as they rely on manual processes and lack automation, leading to potential fraudulent transactions and missed opportunities for customer-specific benefits.

Innovation Solution

An automated system comprising a receiving module, transaction processing engine, verification module, and data store that dynamically verifies customer eligibility for benefits during transactions, using unique identifiers to determine and apply applicable benefits, such as discounts or additional items, without requiring customer awareness or manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual processes are used for benefit verification, then system complexity is reduced, but transaction efficiency and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidtransaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically verifies customer benefits without requiring manual intervention. The verification module autonomously checks the customer's benefit eligibility using their unique identifier from the payment device, and the application module automatically applies applicable benefits to the transaction, eliminating the need for manual verification processes while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs benefit verification in advance during the transaction processing flow. The verification module checks benefit eligibility before the transaction is finalized, and the application module pre-calculates and applies benefits, ensuring efficient transaction processing without adding complexity to the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated verification systems are implemented, then transaction efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is divided into distinct functional modules: a receiving module to accept transaction data, a verification module to check benefit eligibility, and an application module to apply benefits. This segmentation allows each module to perform its specific function independently, improving transaction efficiency while keeping the overall system complexity manageable through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The verification module serves multiple functions by checking both the validity of the unique identifier and the eligibility for various benefits using the same module. The application module similarly handles different types of benefits (discounts, additional items) through a unified process, reducing the need for separate specialized systems and thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If manual benefit verification is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability against fraudulent transactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidfraud prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification module receives the unique identifier from the payment device and automatically queries the data store to verify the customer's benefit eligibility. This automated feedback loop ensures accurate verification of benefit entitlements, preventing fraudulent transactions while maintaining ease of operation as the process occurs automatically without requiring manual judgment or intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If automated verification is implemented, then reliability against fraud is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated verification and benefit application process operates autonomously without requiring manual intervention. The system self-verifies customer eligibility using their unique identifier and automatically applies benefits, maintaining ease of operation as the process is transparent and requires no additional steps from the customer or operator, while simultaneously improving reliability through automated fraud prevention checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7784683B1Systems and methods for automated benefit verification and application
Publication Date: 2010.08.31 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US7784683B1 patent drawing
  • US7784683B1 patent drawing
  • US7784683B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing automated benefit verification and application are described. The apparatus may include a receiving module to receive a transaction, a transaction processing module to process the transaction and parse a unique identifier, a verification module to verify eligibility for a benefit and a data store to store a plurality of unique identifiers. The method may comprise receiving a credit card transaction, determining if a unique identifier contained within the transaction matches one of a stored listing and prompting a user to accept a benefit if the unique identifier matches one of the stored listing. The method may, alternatively, comprise processing a payment device, determining if the user is entitled to a benefit based on information contained within the payment device, prompting the user to accept or decline the benefit and providing the benefit if accepted.