Automated Processing Units for Individual Biopharmaceutical Batches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional production systems for pharmaceuticals, particularly in personalized therapeutics, face high costs, quality variations, and production rejects due to manual interventions, limiting scalability and industrial application of individual and ultrasmall batch sizes, with a need for secure and manipulation-protected manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A production system comprising multiple processing units, a clean room area, airlock devices, handling and storage units, and workpiece carriers, designed to facilitate efficient and secure manufacturing of biological-pharmaceutical products, including patient boxes, tool boxes, and sensor units, with automated handling and monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual interventions are used in production systems for personalized therapeutics, then high personalization level is achieved, but costs increase and quality variations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization levelVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The processing units are equipped with computing units that enable them to autonomously execute production programs and make decisions during manufacturing processes. This self-service capability eliminates manual interventions while maintaining high personalization levels, as the automated systems can adapt to individual patient requirements without human intervention, thereby ensuring consistent quality across all productions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with automated processing units that have integrated computing capabilities. These units can autonomously perform tasks previously requiring human operators, such as setting parameters, monitoring processes, and adjusting conditions. This substitution eliminates quality variations introduced by manual operations while maintaining the ability to produce personalized therapeutics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual interventions are used for highly personalized production, then individual batch sizes are achievable, but production rejects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual batch size capabilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing units autonomously manage the entire production process from setup to completion, including self-diagnosis and self-correction capabilities. This eliminates production rejects by ensuring consistent execution of production programs without human error. The units can handle individual batch sizes efficiently by automatically adjusting parameters based on the specific requirements of each patient's therapeutic needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The computing units in the processing units continuously monitor production parameters and processes, providing real-time feedback to maintain optimal conditions. This feedback mechanism prevents deviations that could lead to production rejects, ensuring high efficiency even when producing individualized batch sizes. The system can detect and correct anomalies automatically, maintaining productivity while accommodating personalized production requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If secure and manipulation-protected production is implemented, then quality level is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions including security management, manipulation protection, and production control into integrated processing units with embedded computing systems. This merging reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what would otherwise be separate systems into unified modules. The processing units inherently provide both quality assurance and security functions through their integrated design, maintaining high quality levels without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing units are designed as multi-functional modules that simultaneously perform production operations, quality monitoring, security verification, and manipulation protection. This universality means that a single component handles multiple responsibilities, reducing the need for additional separate systems. The computing units provide both operational control and security functions, maintaining quality while avoiding proportional increases in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If automated processing units with computing units are deployed, then manual interventions are reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidprocess control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The computing units in the processing units incorporate real-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms that continuously measure production parameters and automatically adjust processes to maintain precise control. This feedback capability ensures that manufacturing precision requirements are met even at high automation levels, as the system can detect and correct deviations immediately without manual intervention. The precision is maintained through automated closed-loop control rather than relying on manual operator skill.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual precision operations with automated processing units that use computing power to control processes with high precision. The computing units can execute production programs with exact parameter control, eliminating the variability inherent in manual operations. This substitution enables maintaining manufacturing precision while achieving high automation, as the digital control systems can maintain tighter tolerances than manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250298811A1Production system for the manufacture of a product
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 KYOOBE TECH GMBH
  • US20250298811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298811A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A production system (10) for manufacturing a product (20), in particular a biological-pharmaceutical product, which comprises multiple processing units (30, 50, 702, 704) for accommodating and/or treating an educt (40), and/or to a method for this purpose.