Automated Passenger Boarding Bridge Docking Control

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual docking of passenger boarding bridges to aircraft is time-consuming and prone to delays, especially when operators are busy with other tasks, leading to costly ground handling delays.

Innovation Solution

An automated docking method using a central control unit that coordinates sensors and actuators to align and secure the bridgehead with the aircraft door, including a canopy, shutter, and leveling system, allowing for autonomous operation without the need for a fully trained operator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual docking is used with an operator controlling the PBB, then the operator can make real-time decisions, but the docking process is time-consuming and requires operator availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The PBB system performs docking operations autonomously using its own sensors (camera, LIDAR, ultrasonic sensors) and control unit to detect aircraft position and execute docking maneuvers without requiring continuous operator intervention, thereby reducing docking time while maintaining reliability through self-monitoring and safety mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated control system that uses optical sensors (camera), LIDAR, and ultrasonic sensors to detect aircraft position and automatically controls the PBB's drive means, replacing the operator's mechanical joystick control with an automated sensing and control loop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If a fully trained operator is required for complete docking procedure, then operational control is maintained, but operator availability becomes a bottleneck causing delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The PBB system performs docking operations autonomously using its own sensors (camera, LIDAR, ultrasonic sensors) and control unit to detect aircraft position and execute docking maneuvers without requiring continuous operator intervention, thereby reducing docking time while maintaining reliability through self-monitoring and safety mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The docking procedure is segmented into distinct phases: approach phase with full operator supervision, automatic docking phase where the control unit autonomously positions the bridgehead, and final alignment phase with safety verification. This segmentation allows routine portions to be automated while maintaining operator control for critical decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated docking is implemented, then operator availability is no longer a constraint, but the system complexity increases with multiple sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The camera system serves multiple functions: detecting the aircraft door contour, identifying the line of windows, determining aircraft position, and verifying docking alignment. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized sensors, thereby managing system complexity while enabling automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple sensing modalities (camera, LIDAR, ultrasonic sensors) into a unified automated control system that processes data from all sensors through a single control unit, merging separate functions into an integrated system that manages complexity through coordination rather than multiplication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If the PBB is manually docked to the aircraft, then the operator can ensure proper alignment, but the process is delayed when the operator is busy with another PBB

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated control system that uses optical sensors (camera), LIDAR, and ultrasonic sensors to detect aircraft position and automatically controls the PBB's drive means, replacing the operator's mechanical joystick control with an automated sensing and control loop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors aircraft position using camera, LIDAR, and ultrasonic sensors, compares detected position with target alignment parameters, and automatically adjusts PBB movement in real-time to achieve precise door alignment, providing closed-loop feedback control that ensures accuracy without operator intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3887255B1Method for automated handling a passenger boarding bridge
Publication Date: 2024.08.21
  • EP3887255B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3887255B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3887255B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

Method for automated handling a passenger boarding bridge (10), the method comprising the step of moving the passenger boarding bridge from a retracted position into a docking position or vice versa, in which a bridgehead (13) of the passenger boarding bridge (10) is temporary aligned with an aircraft door (3), wherein the passenger boarding bridge is handled in dependency of at least one status signal (A) referring to the status of an ancillary component (50, 60, 70, 80).