Automated Border Inspection System for Passenger Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current border crossing systems rely on manual checks, which are inefficient and may not accurately verify authorized passengers and vehicles, leading to potential security risks and delays.

Innovation Solution

An automated border inspection system that uses data processing and sensor technologies to pre-vet passengers and vehicles before arrival, identifying them upon entry and guiding them to appropriate lanes based on authorization status, thereby reducing the need for manual inspection and enhancing security and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checks are used by border control officers, then security verification can be performed, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesecurity verificationVSAvoidprocessing time

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-registering vehicles and passengers before border crossing, storing their data in advance. When vehicles approach the border, the system automatically retrieves and verifies pre-stored data, eliminating the need for manual document checks and significantly reducing processing time while maintaining security verification.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual inspection system with an automated electronic verification system. Sensors capture vehicle and passenger data, which is then automatically compared against pre-registered information in databases. This substitution of mechanical human inspection with automated electronic processes reduces processing time while maintaining or improving verification reliability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual inspection is performed on all vehicles, then security can be ensured, but productivity and throughput are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovesecurityVSAvoidborder crossing throughput

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling vehicles and passengers to pre-register their information before arrival at the border. The automated system then independently verifies this pre-registered data without requiring manual inspection. This self-service approach allows multiple vehicles to be processed simultaneously through automated verification, dramatically increasing throughput while maintaining security through continuous automated checks.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated verification system serves multiple functions: it verifies vehicle registration, checks passenger authorization, validates border crossing permissions, and controls gate operations all through a single integrated system. This multi-functionality allows the system to handle diverse verification requirements simultaneously, improving both security coverage and processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated recognition systems are implemented, then processing speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is segmented into distinct functional modules: vehicle identification module, passenger data collection module, database query module, verification module, and gate control module. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently managed and maintained. This segmentation reduces operational complexity while enabling high-speed automated processing through parallel operation of multiple modules.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If pre-registration is required for automated processing, then throughput increases, but adaptability to unregistered travelers decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidhandling unregistered travelers

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system inverts the traditional approach by allowing automated processing for pre-registered travelers while directing unregistered or suspicious travelers to manual inspection lanes. This inversion enables the majority of routine crossings to proceed through high-speed automated channels, while maintaining the capability to handle special cases through alternative manual processes, thus preserving both throughput and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS10846809B2Automated border inspection

Publication Date: 2020.11.24 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for controlling access to physical areas. One of the methods includes receiving first data, determining, using the first data, whether each of the passengers for a vehicle is authorized to cross a border, storing second data in a data set of pre-registered border crossers, receiving third data identifying the vehicle and indicating entry of the vehicle into a border crossing station, comparing the third data with data from the data set of pre-registered border crossers, determining that the third data and the second data both identify the vehicle, collecting, for each current passenger in the vehicle, fourth data representing the current passenger, determining whether the current passengers in the vehicle and the passengers identified in the second data are the same people, and providing instructions to guide the vehicle to a lane at the border crossing station.