Automated Choke Control for Mud-Gas Separator Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling systems face inefficiencies and safety risks during the removal of unknown fluids containing gas from the wellbore and marine riser, primarily due to manual control processes that are prone to error and depend on pressure or flow conditions upstream of the choke manifold.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing instrumented mud-gas separators with fluid and pressure sensors to automatically control the choke manifold and mud pumps, ensuring safe and efficient delivery of unknown fluids to the separators by monitoring their state in real-time and adjusting flow rates accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual control processes are used to manage fluid return during drilling operations, then operational flexibility is maintained, but safety risks increase and response time is delayed due to human error and manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors fluid return conditions (flow rate, gas content, pressure) and automatically adjusts choke manifold settings based on real-time feedback. This closed-loop control eliminates manual intervention delays and ensures immediate response to changing well conditions, directly resolving the contradiction between safety and response time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control system performs self-adjustment of fluid return management without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously detects kicks, calculates optimal choke settings, and executes control actions, thereby eliminating human error and response delays while maintaining continuous safety monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If low flow rates are used to simplify manual control of pressures, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity decreases due to extended removal time for gas from fluids

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control simplicityVSAvoidgas removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts flow rates based on real-time well conditions and mud-gas separator state. Rather than maintaining static low flow rates for simplicity, the automated system optimizes flow rates continuously, achieving both ease of operation through automation and high productivity through adaptive flow management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (flow rate, pressure, choke opening) dynamically based on real-time conditions and separator state. This allows the system to operate at optimal productivity levels while the automated control maintains operational simplicity, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automatic control systems with real-time monitoring are implemented, then productivity and safety are improved, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid delivery speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a single automated platform that performs monitoring, calculation, and control operations. The system uses existing infrastructure (choke manifold, mud-gas separator) while adding intelligent control capabilities, achieving high productivity without proportionally increasing complexity through multi-functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a control intermediary (automated control unit) that bridges the existing drilling equipment and the mud-gas separator. This intermediary handles the complexity of real-time monitoring and control, allowing the rest of the system to remain relatively simple while achieving high productivity through intelligent mediation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the choke manifold is controlled based on upstream pressure or flow conditions, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates because it does not directly monitor separator state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidseparator state monitoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements direct feedback from the mud-gas separator state (fluid level, pressure, gas content) to the choke manifold control. This ensures the choke settings are precisely adjusted based on actual separator conditions rather than indirect upstream measurements, resolving the contradiction between control simplicity and measurement precision through automated feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces indirect mechanical pressure/flow-based control with direct electronic sensing and control based on separator state. Sensors directly monitor separator conditions and electronically adjust the choke manifold, achieving both operational simplicity through automation and high measurement precision through direct monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the time required to remove gas from unknown fluids and enhances safety by automating the process, reducing reliance on manual intervention and minimizing risks associated with gas expansion and overflow.

Implementation Method 1

instrumented mud-gas separators...to automatically control the choke manifold and mud pumps, ensuring safe and efficient delivery of unknown fluids to the separators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity difference separation: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 2

instrumented mud-gas separators with fluid and pressure sensors to automatically control the choke manifold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3698010B1Method and system for controlled delivery of unknown fluids
Publication Date: 2023.06.14 SAFEKICK AMERICAS LLC
  • EP3698010B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3698010B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3698010B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for controlled delivery of unknown fluids that safely and efficiently removes entrained gas from unknown fluids in the wellbore and/or marine riser. A control system automatically controls one or more choke manifold(s), and optionally the flow rate of one or more mud pump(s), to maximize the safe flow rate of returning unknown fluids to one or more instrumented mud-gas separator(s) without overloading. The control system may receive the state of the one or more instrumented mudgas separator(s) to manipulate the choke manifold(s), and optionally the one or more mud pump(s) to maximize the safe flow rate of return fluids and expedite the removal of gases.