Automated Cine CMR Image Characterization Using Deep Learning
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for analyzing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images are time-consuming and prone to human error, lacking a comprehensive quality control (QC) framework that can independently identify errors across various sources, which hampers the efficiency and accuracy of image selection and analysis.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method using deep learning (DL) algorithms for automated characterization of CMR images, incorporating a pre- and post-analysis QC framework that classifies and selects images based on metadata, image quality, and orientation, enabling robust and independent error detection, and integrating with a larger pipeline for comprehensive QC of cine CMR images.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If manual analysis of CMR images is performed, then clinicians can review and interpret images, but the process is highly time-consuming and repetitive
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs automated image identification, selection, and segmentation using deep learning algorithms, allowing the imaging system to serve itself without requiring continuous clinician intervention for these repetitive tasks
Solution Approach 2:
Manual mechanical analysis by clinicians is replaced with automated computational algorithms that can process images rapidly while maintaining high accuracy in identification, selection, and segmentation tasks
2Productivity
If deep learning algorithms are used for automated analysis, then time required for image analysis is significantly reduced, but comprehensive quality control of the output is lacking
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements a feedback mechanism where quality control metrics are calculated from the deep learning output and fed back into the system to automatically adjust parameters and re-process images that do not meet quality thresholds
Solution Approach 2:
Quality control checks are performed preliminarily during the image selection and processing stages, rather than only after complete analysis, allowing early detection and correction of potential issues
3Device complexity
If a single quality control check based on segmentation metrics is performed, then the process is simple, but it cannot detect errors from other sources such as image quality or orientation
Solution Approach 1:
The quality control process is segmented into multiple independent checkpoints: image quality assessment, orientation verification, and segmentation metric validation, each addressing specific error sources separately before integration
4Extent of automation
If automated classification and selection of images is implemented, then clinician oversight is reduced, but the system requires robust quality control mechanisms
Solution Approach 1:
Image quality and orientation are assessed preliminarily before automated classification and selection, ensuring that only images meeting quality thresholds are processed further by the automated system
Solution Approach 2:
The automated quality control system continuously monitors its own performance and adjusts classification parameters based on feedback from quality metrics, maintaining robustness as automation increases
Data Source
AI summary
The present disclosure relates to a method for automated characterisation of images obtained using a medical imaging modality, in particular, the present disclosure relates to a method for analysis of cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images using an artificial intelligence (AI) framework.