Automated Coin Grading Using Machine Learning for Consistent Valuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional coin grading is subjective and inconsistent, leading to significant variations in coin valuation due to manual grading processes, which can result in buyers paying unfair prices.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based automated assessment and grading system using a machine learning model trained on a dataset of reference coin images with manually curated grades, allowing for objective grading and validation of proposed grades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual grading by experts is used, then grading expertise and judgment are applied, but grading time is long (30-60 days) and grading is inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading consistencyVSAvoidgrading time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical grading process with an automated machine learning-based system. The machine learning model processes coin images and assigns grades automatically, eliminating the need for manual expert review and thereby reducing grading time from 30-60 days to a much faster automated process, while improving consistency through algorithmic objectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the coin through imaging and then analyzes this digital representation using machine learning algorithms. This copying approach allows for repeated, consistent analysis of the same coin data without variation between graders, solving the inconsistency problem while maintaining grading accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual grading is used, then expert judgment is applied, but grading subjectivity leads to inconsistencies in assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading accuracyVSAvoidgrading consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes subjective human judgment with objective machine learning algorithms that process coin images consistently. The system uses trained neural networks to analyze coin features and assign grades based on learned patterns from training data, eliminating the subjectivity and inconsistency inherent in manual grading while maintaining high accuracy through algorithmic precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the machine learning model is trained on previously graded coins and continuously refines its grading criteria. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from expert gradings and improve its consistency over time, achieving both accuracy and reliability in automated grading

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated machine learning grading is implemented, then grading speed and consistency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the grading system into distinct functional components: image acquisition module, image processing module, machine learning classification module, and grading output module. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining high productivity through automated processing at each stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250246039A1Automated grading and assessment of coins
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC
  • US20250246039A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246039A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246039A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for automatically grading and assessing coins. In one embodiment, a machine learning model is trained based at least in part on first images respectively depicting coins of a particular type. The coins are manually assigned a respective coin classification. A second image is received depicting a different coin of the particular type. An analysis of the second image is performed based at least in part on the machine learning model. A particular coin classification is assigned to the different coin based at least in part on the analysis of the second image.