Automated Communication System Optimizing Contact Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals often fail to maintain consistent communication with important contacts, leading to strained relationships and decreased sales and customer satisfaction due to the difficulty in remembering when to communicate effectively.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that optimizes communication by reminding users of overdue contacts and automatically initiating communication based on success rates and user-defined preferences, determining the most effective method and time for contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual communication tracking is used, then simplicity is maintained, but communication consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically tracks communication history, determines optimal communication timing, and initiates communications without requiring manual intervention. The automated communication manager monitors contact lists, evaluates communication success rates, and schedules follow-up communications based on predefined criteria and learned patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates optimal communication timing based on historical data and success rates before actual communication occurs. It prepares communication schedules and selects best times to contact based on previous interaction patterns, ensuring communications are initiated at the most effective moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If automated communication initiation is implemented, then communication consistency is improved, but user control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication consistencyVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts communication strategies based on real-time feedback and success rates. It learns from each communication outcome and adapts future communication timing and methodology accordingly, optimizing effectiveness while maintaining flexibility in response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors communication success rates and uses this feedback to refine future communication scheduling. It evaluates whether communications were successful and adjusts subsequent communication timing based on this performance data, creating a self-improving system that maintains user intent while optimizing execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If communication timing is optimized based on success rates, then communication effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication effectivenessVSAvoidoptimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual judgment of optimal communication timing with automated algorithms that analyze historical data patterns. It substitutes human decision-making with computational evaluation of success rates, communication timing, and contact behavior patterns to determine optimal scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of communication timing based on measured success rates and historical performance data. It adjusts scheduling parameters dynamically, selecting optimal times to contact based on analyzed patterns from previous communications, thereby optimizing effectiveness through data-driven parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If manual tracking of contact information is used, then simplicity is maintained, but communication timeliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication timelinessVSAvoidtracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors communication status and maintains constant readiness to initiate follow-up communications. It continuously updates contact information, tracks communication history, and maintains an ongoing schedule of optimal communication times, ensuring no timely communication opportunity is missed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-schedules communication times based on historical data and success rates before actual communication occurs. It calculates and prepares optimal communication timing in advance, ensuring communications are initiated at the most effective moment without requiring manual tracking or intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10810498B2System and method for automating proactive communication
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 ADEIA MEDIA HOLDINGS INC
  • US10810498B2 patent drawing
  • US10810498B2 patent drawing
  • US10810498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for automating proactive communication. The information for the desired contacts may be accepted from a user. A selection of contact communication frequency preferences may be received from a user. An automatic communication to one of the desired contacts may be initiated. The user may be allowed to cancel the automatic communication, in response to receiving a notification that the communication is about to begin. A response indicative of the communication status may be received. Rules and preferences may be optimized based upon the received response.