Automated CRM Onboarding System for Financial Services

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing onboarding processes for new clients in industries like insurance, brokerage, and banking are inefficient and prone to errors due to human intervention, leading to increased costs and delays.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that uses digital forms filled out by potential clients or their representatives, which are processed through CRM software like Salesforce, allowing for auto-filled information, automated account generation, and electronic document signing without human intervention, except for final approval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human operators manually complete and send forms to prospective clients, then the onboarding process can be completed with current technology and tools, but the process becomes costly, time-consuming, and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of information entryVSAvoidonboarding speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated form population where client information is automatically retrieved from existing databases and forms are auto-filled, eliminating the need for manual data entry by operators and reducing both errors and processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical processes of form handling are replaced with an automated digital system that uses software to populate forms, track completion status, and manage the onboarding workflow, substituting human operators with an automated information management system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If human operators manually handle form completion and tracking, then the process can accommodate complex client needs, but overhead costs increase and service quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle complex client needsVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system provides multi-functionality by handling various form types (application forms, disclosure forms, consent forms), tracking multiple client information sources, managing different completion scenarios, and coordinating with multiple stakeholders through a single integrated platform

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated platform that mediates between client information sources, form requirements, and final submission, automatically matching client data with appropriate form fields and managing the complexity of coordinating multiple parties without requiring human operators to manage the complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If digital forms are automatedly populated and sent through CRM software, then onboarding efficiency increases and human error decreases, but the system requires automated processing capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveonboarding efficiencyVSAvoidlevel of automated processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-populating forms with client information from existing databases before forms are sent to clients, and by pre-tracking form completion status, eliminating the need for manual data entry and follow-up efforts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by automatically tracking form completion status and notifying relevant parties when forms are signed and returned, creating a closed-loop system that provides real-time information about onboarding progress without requiring manual status checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of time

If the system automatically generates and tracks forms through decision algorithms, then processing speed increases, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform processing timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the onboarding process into distinct automated stages: client information retrieval, form selection based on decision algorithms, form population, distribution tracking, and completion monitoring, allowing each segment to be handled by specialized automated functions that reduce overall processing time despite increased system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240330864A1Automated Onboarding Method
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 FINANCIAL AI CORP
  • US20240330864A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330864A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330864A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated onboarding method provides a form which a prospective client fills out, preferably electronically, which is received by a customer relations management (CRM) software. The CRM software assigns a customer account number and populates the CRM account with the information from the form in an automated manner. At least one document is generated, preferably automatedly and sent to the potential customer to execute. When received the system may automatedly complete the onboarding process, possibly including sending an account transfer or funding form signed by the potential client to a third party for execution and updating to establish the account when funded, potentially with no human interaction during the process, or if interaction, only for authentication of the legitimacy of the applicants.