Automated Decision Process for Uncertainty Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decision processes require significant human intervention, leading to bottlenecks in efficiently addressing uncertainties, particularly in situations with large amounts of available information, which limits the throughput and effectiveness of decision-making in fields like product and service research and development.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive decision process that enables an automatic closed-loop approach to information gathering and evaluation, utilizing computer-based systems to automate the determination of optimal actions for resolving uncertainties, incorporating probabilistic inferencing and experimental design to maximize the value of information gathered.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual modeling and expert intervention are used to determine expected value of information and experimental design, then decision quality can be maintained through human judgment, but productivity and throughput are significantly limited by manual bottlenecks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision qualityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service by implementing computer-based probabilistic inferencing and experimental design capabilities that automatically determine expected value of information and optimize experimental parameters without requiring manual statistician intervention, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining decision quality and increasing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual human expert analysis with computer-based automated inferencing systems, using algorithms to perform probabilistic reasoning and experimental design optimization, thus eliminating manual bottlenecks while preserving decision quality through systematic computational methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If high throughput experimentation methods are implemented to rapidly acquire new information, then information gathering speed increases, but manual bottlenecks in interpreting results and adjusting experimentation limit the actually attainable throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation gathering speedVSAvoidactually attainable throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where computer-based inferencing continuously analyzes experimental results and automatically adjusts subsequent experimentation parameters, creating a closed-loop system that eliminates manual interpretation bottlenecks and maintains high throughput throughout the entire experimentation and analysis process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis and interpretation of experimental results in real-time as data becomes available, rather than waiting for manual review, thereby maintaining the high speed of information gathering while eliminating downstream bottlenecks in result interpretation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated experimental design and inferencing systems are implemented, then productivity and throughput are significantly improved, but system complexity increases due to integration of probabilistic inferencing and experimental design algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal computer-based system that integrates multiple functions including probabilistic inferencing, experimental design optimization, and result analysis into a single multi-functional platform, thereby achieving high throughput while managing complexity through functional integration rather than separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11120347B2Optimizing data-to-learning-to-action
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 MANYWORLDS INC
  • US11120347B2 patent drawing
  • US11120347B2 patent drawing
  • US11120347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimizing data-to-learning-to-action method and system identifies uncertainties embodied as probability distributions that influence a sequence of decisions. The uncertainties are mapped to a simulation of a computer-based infrastructure that supports the execution of the decisions. Actions with respect to the infrastructure that are expected to reduce the uncertainties are simulated. The probability distributions are updated accordingly for each simulated action and an associated net value of information for each simulated action is generated. The action with the greatest net value of information is implemented and the simulated infrastructure is updated accordingly. The process may then be re-run based upon the updated simulated infrastructure.