Automated Demand Response System for Grid Frequency Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy demand curtailment methods rely heavily on human involvement, which is inefficient and prone to errors, especially during critical and time-sensitive 'demand response' events, leading to inadequate demand reduction and increased operational costs for utilities.

Innovation Solution

A fully automated system that adapts power grid usage by controlling internal and external assets in response to power regulation and frequency regulation functions, using a demand reduction server to transmit commands to users for automated demand response without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human involvement is used in energy demand curtailment, then operational flexibility and decision-making capability are maintained, but response time is delayed and errors increase during critical demand response events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand reduction effectivenessVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring demand response parameters, setting thresholds, and establishing control rules before demand response events occur. This allows the automated system to immediately execute appropriate demand reduction actions when events are detected, eliminating human response delays while maintaining decision-making quality through pre-planned strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing demand response actions to be automatically executed without human intervention. The automated system monitors grid conditions, detects demand response events, and implements demand reduction measures independently, thereby eliminating human response time delays and errors while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If human involvement is used in energy demand curtailment, then complex decision-making can be performed, but operational costs and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand reduction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical human decision-making process with an automated electronic control system. The automated system uses sensors, processors, and communication networks to monitor grid conditions and execute demand response actions, thereby eliminating human errors and operational costs while maintaining complex decision-making capabilities through programmable control logic and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring grid conditions, demand response event status, and demand reduction effectiveness. This real-time feedback enables the automated system to adjust its control actions dynamically, maintaining high productivity while reducing operational complexity through closed-loop control that automatically corrects deviations without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If automated demand response is implemented, then response time and accuracy are improved, but system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand response accuracyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the demand response functionality into separate modular components: event detection modules, control rule engines, execution modules, and monitoring modules. This modular architecture reduces overall system complexity by allowing each component to be independently developed, tested, and maintained, while the integrated system achieves high response accuracy through coordinated operation of these specialized modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements universality by designing a multi-functional automated demand response platform that can handle various types of demand response events, different control strategies, and multiple utility company requirements through a single integrated system. This universal design reduces complexity by avoiding the need for separate specialized systems for each function while maintaining high accuracy through configurable parameters and adaptable control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9002761B2Method and system for automatically adapting end user power usage
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 MONTALVO REY
  • US9002761B2 patent drawing
  • US9002761B2 patent drawing
  • US9002761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method and apparatus for automatically adapting power grid usage by controlling internal and/or external power-related assets of one or more users in response to power regulation and/or frequency regulation functions in a manner beneficial to both the power grid itself and the users of the power grid.