Automated Design Ranking for Generative Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generative design processes are hindered by the time-consuming manual evaluation of vast numbers of designs, leading to the omission of potentially preferred designs and selection of non-optimal options due to the prohibitive effort required to explore the design space.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for automatically ranking designs based on user preferences, using a ranking subsystem that determines positive and negative examples, computes scores, and generates a ranked list to facilitate efficient exploration of the design space through a graphical user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of designs generated by the generative design application is increased to provide a more comprehensive design space, then the completeness of the design space is improved, but the time required for manual evaluation increases prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of designsVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical evaluation process with an automated computer-based ranking system. The system uses algorithms to automatically score and rank designs based on user preferences, substituting human manual scrutiny with computational evaluation that can process thousands of designs efficiently without proportional time increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service evaluation where the computer automatically performs the evaluation and ranking of designs without requiring user intervention for each design. The automated ranking system independently assesses designs against user preferences and generates ordered results, freeing users from the time-consuming manual evaluation task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If the number of designs is limited to reduce evaluation time, then the evaluation time is reduced, but the design space becomes incomplete and may omit preferred designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation timeVSAvoiddesign space completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The automated ranking system replaces manual evaluation, enabling comprehensive assessment of large design spaces without time penalties. This substitution allows the system to maintain complete design spaces while avoiding the prohibitive time costs of manual review by using efficient computational scoring methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual evaluation of designs is performed to ensure selection of optimal designs, then the quality of design selection is improved, but the complexity and time consumption of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign selection qualityVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual evaluation processes with automated computational ranking systems. These systems use algorithms to objectively score designs based on user preferences, eliminating the complexity and subjectivity of manual assessment while maintaining or improving selection quality through consistent, repeatable evaluation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the evaluation process by changing from qualitative manual judgment to quantitative automated scoring. Designs are assigned numerical scores based on user preferences, converting subjective evaluation into objective parameter-based ranking that simplifies the selection process while improving consistency and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11669220B2Example-based ranking techniques for exploring design spaces
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 AUTODESK INC
  • US11669220B2 patent drawing
  • US11669220B2 patent drawing
  • US11669220B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, a ranking application automatically ranks designs included in a design space based on user preference(s). The ranking application determines that a first design included in the design space is a first positive example of user preference(s). The ranking application then computes a score associated with a second design that is also included in the design space based on a first attribute value and a second attribute value. The first attribute value is associated with both the first design and an attribute and the second value is associated with both the second design and the attribute. Subsequently, the ranking application orders the designs based on the first score and a second score associated with the second design to generate a ranked list of designs. The ranking application then displays the ranked list of designs via a graphical user interface to facilitate exploration of the design space.