Automated Device Interface Sequence for Physical Input Data Exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

User interactions with automated devices, such as ATMs, are often time-consuming and frustrating due to high input requirements, excessive or insufficient information, and can be error-prone for seniors, individuals with disabilities, and those uncomfortable with technology.

Innovation Solution

An automated device equipped with a display screen, communication module, optical scanner, processor, and memory, which guides users through a sequence of interfaces for physical input to update account data, including selection, processing, confirmation, and transmission to a server, providing clear summaries and options for confirmation and session management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a high number of inputs are required to complete a desired action, then data exchange functionality is comprehensive, but user interaction time increases and user frustration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata exchange efficiencyVSAvoiduser interaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically retrieving and presenting relevant account information to the user before the user needs to make decisions. The interface proactively displays data that the user will need, reducing the number of manual input steps required and accelerating the data exchange process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated device performs self-service functions by automatically gathering account data, generating interface content, and preparing information for exchange without requiring extensive manual input from the user. The system serves itself by autonomously completing data retrieval and presentation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If too much information is provided during interaction, then completeness of data is improved, but user confusion and interaction complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiduser interaction ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The interface applies local quality by dynamically tailoring the information presented to each user's specific needs and context. Rather than displaying all possible information uniformly, the system selectively presents relevant data elements based on the user's account type, previous interactions, and current task, making the interface both complete and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The information is segmented into logical groups and presented in a structured sequence. The interface divides comprehensive data into manageable sections, allowing users to process information in discrete units rather than overwhelming them with all data at once, while still providing access to complete information when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If too little information is provided during interaction, then interface simplicity is improved, but user errors increase and user frustration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoidinteraction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that provide users with confirmation of their selections and information about the state of data exchange. The interface continuously updates users with relevant information about progress, expected outcomes, and any issues that may arise, enabling users to make accurate decisions without being overwhelmed by excessive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If the interface requires multiple sequential steps, then data validation is improved, but user time and patience are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validation accuracyVSAvoidtransaction completion speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Data validation is performed as a preliminary action in the background before the user completes all input steps. The system pre-validates data elements as they are entered and prepares validation results in advance, allowing rapid confirmation or correction without interrupting the user's workflow, thus maintaining both accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Streamlines user interactions by reducing the number of steps and errors, enhancing usability and satisfaction across various user groups by providing a clear, efficient, and accessible interface for data exchange tasks.

Implementation Method 1

process, using the optical scanner, the physical input to determine a data value represented by the physical input

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical scanning:

Data Source

PatentUS11069201B2Automated device for exchange of data
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK
  • US11069201B2 patent drawing
  • US11069201B2 patent drawing
  • US11069201B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for providing physical input at an automated device are described. An automated device provides a sequence of interfaces. The automated device communicates with a server to exchange data, which is used to dynamically populate one or more of the interfaces in the sequence. The interface sequence includes: a physical input type selection interface providing an option to provide physical input; a physical input request interface requesting physical input; a physical input processing interface indicating processing; a data value confirmation interface showing determined value for the physical input; a summary interface indicating restrictions for an account; a data update processing interface indicating further processing; an acknowledgement interface indicating the account was updated to reflect the physical input; and an record preview interface providing a preview of a session record.