Automated Liquid Dispensing Attachment for Consistent Pouring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional liquid dispensing systems in the drink serving industry lack automation, leading to inconsistencies in drink pouring, increased training requirements, and significant management overhead due to manual methods and partial automation, which results in inefficiencies and losses such as overpouring, underpouring, and theft.

Innovation Solution

An automated liquid dispensing attachment with sensors and processing circuitry that ensures accurate and controlled dispensing by confirming attachment to a container, monitoring fluid levels, and controlling the dispensing process, integrated with a communication system for data collection and analysis to optimize operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual pouring methods are used by bartenders, then operational flexibility is maintained, but pouring consistency and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidpouring consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated pouring system performs the pouring function autonomously without requiring manual operation by bartenders. The system self-regulates the pouring process through sensors that detect liquid levels and flow rates, automatically controlling the dispensing mechanism to achieve consistent pours while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If automated pouring systems are implemented, then pouring consistency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepouring consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical pouring control with electronic sensing and control mechanisms. Flow sensors, level sensors, and electronic control circuits substitute for manual mechanical adjustment mechanisms, achieving precise pouring control through electronic feedback loops rather than complex mechanical linkages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system incorporates feedback mechanisms where sensors continuously monitor liquid flow rate and container level, feeding this information back to the control system. The controller adjusts the dispensing mechanism in real-time based on this feedback to maintain consistent pouring, simplifying the overall control architecture through closed-loop regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If partial automation with activation buttons is used, then some control is automated, but monitoring capability and loss prevention remain insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepouring automationVSAvoidloss prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements comprehensive feedback through multiple sensors including flow sensors that monitor liquid discharge, level sensors that track remaining inventory, and attachment sensors that verify proper installation. This feedback network provides real-time data to the control system, enabling automatic detection of anomalies such as unauthorized dispensing or equipment malfunction, thereby preventing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary control unit that acts as a mediator between the dispensing mechanism and the user interface. This intermediary processor manages all sensing inputs, executes control algorithms, and provides monitoring outputs, centralizing the intelligence required for reliable loss prevention while keeping the physical dispensing mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If manual monitoring and tracking are performed by bartenders, then operational simplicity is maintained, but management overhead and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidmanagement overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-tracking functions autonomously. Sensors automatically record dispensing volumes, track inventory levels, and log operational data without requiring bartender intervention. This eliminates the time burden of manual monitoring while keeping the system interface simple, requiring minimal training for staff to operate or maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12258256B2Connected and automated liquid dispensing attachment
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 L2F INC
  • US12258256B2 patent drawing
  • US12258256B2 patent drawing
  • US12258256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated liquid dispensing attachment monitors and controls preparation of drinks poured from bottles. The automated liquid dispensing attachment attaches to a bottle and senses multiple aspects of the pouring of the drink, and based on the sensor outputs, monitors and controls the flow of fluids from the bottle through the attachment. The automated liquid dispensing attachment communicates with other electronic devices to enable individualized control and monitoring, and data aggregation and analysis.