Automated Driver Alert System with Local Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver alert systems, such as Amber alerts, rely on driver involvement and awareness, which can lead to inefficiencies in information dissemination and recall, potentially rendering the alerts ineffective.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that distributes and processes driver alerts within vehicles, using geographically limited broadcasts and digital signatures, allowing alerts to be automatically implemented without driver intervention, including activation of vehicle cameras to monitor for specific license plates and reporting to authorities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driver alert systems rely on driver involvement and awareness, then the system can be simple and easy to implement, but the effectiveness of alert dissemination and recall deteriorates due to human error and distraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of alert disseminationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables vehicles to automatically receive, process, and respond to alerts without requiring driver intervention. The vehicle's onboard systems self-manage the alert dissemination process, including automatic camera activation and image capture, eliminating human error while maintaining system simplicity through automated workflows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human cognitive process (reading, remembering, recalling, and acting on alert information) with an automated electronic system that receives alerts, processes them through software algorithms, and automatically activates vehicle systems to capture and report suspect vehicle imagery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated vehicle systems are implemented to process alerts without driver intervention, then alert processing effectiveness improves, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and automated processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert processing efficiencyVSAvoidvehicle system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages existing multi-functional vehicle components, particularly the camera system that serves both safety/monitoring purposes and alert response functions. This approach increases alert processing efficiency without significantly adding to vehicle complexity, as the same hardware performs multiple functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines alert processing functions with existing vehicle telematics and camera systems rather than creating separate dedicated systems. The alert gateway integrates with the vehicle's existing communication infrastructure, and the camera system is repurposed for alert response, merging multiple functions into existing components to avoid complexity multiplication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If vehicle location information is shared with alert systems, then alert accuracy and targeting improve, but driver privacy deteriorates due to location tracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert geographic targeting accuracyVSAvoiddriver privacy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements geographic filtering that processes alerts locally at the vehicle level rather than continuously transmitting location data. The vehicle receives broadcast alerts and automatically filters them based on its current location context, maintaining precise geographic targeting while minimizing privacy intrusion by processing location data locally without continuous external transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If digital signatures and authentication are implemented to prevent misuse, then system security improves, but device complexity increases due to additional verification processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem security against misuseVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements digital signature verification as a preliminary step in the alert processing workflow. Alerts are authenticated before being processed or acted upon, ensuring security is built into the foundation of the system rather than added as a complex post-processing layer. This preliminary authentication approach maintains security while keeping the overall system architecture simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9305459B2Automated driver alert system
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 TAHOE RES LTD
  • US9305459B2 patent drawing
  • US9305459B2 patent drawing
  • US9305459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with some embodiments, an automated system may be implemented in which alerts to drivers are automatically distributed and implemented at the driver's vehicle. Thus, in some embodiments, no involvement by the driver is needed and everything may be done in an automated fashion including filtering alerts and responding to alerts. In some embodiments, each vehicle need not provide its current location to the Amber Alert System, providing greater privacy in some cases.