Automated Driving Feedback System for Driver Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

New and inexperienced drivers, as well as reckless drivers, often cause vehicle accidents due to inadequate driving skills, and existing automated driving systems lack effective mechanisms to provide dynamic feedback for improving driver performance in real-time.

Innovation Solution

An automated driving system that compares driver inputs with its own maneuver controls, generates deviation metrics, and provides driver performance feedback through notifications and updates the system based on these metrics to improve driving skills, using a combination of haptic, audio, and visual cues to guide the driver towards safer maneuvers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated driving system provides real-time feedback to driver, then driver performance improvement is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously compares driver inputs with automated driving system maneuver controls and provides real-time feedback through notifications when deviations are detected. This feedback loop enables driver performance improvement by highlighting discrepancies between driver actions and optimal maneuvers, directly addressing the reliability improvement while managing complexity through targeted feedback rather than comprehensive control takeover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback selectively based on predefined deviation thresholds rather than continuously monitoring and responding to all driver actions. By triggering notifications only when deviations exceed acceptable limits, the system achieves effective driver guidance without the complexity of constant intervention, applying partial action only where necessary for safety and performance improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If system provides continuous driver monitoring and feedback, then driving safety improves, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system focuses monitoring and feedback on specific critical parameters such as steering angle, acceleration, and braking deviations rather than analyzing all possible driving inputs. By concentrating computational resources on locally important deviations that most impact safety, the system improves driving safety without being overwhelmed by the total information load from continuous monitoring of all vehicle systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a threshold-based filtering mechanism that acts as an intermediary between raw driver input data and feedback generation. This intermediary layer compares driver actions against automated system maneuvers and only triggers feedback when deviations exceed predefined thresholds, significantly reducing the information processing load by eliminating the need to analyze and respond to every minor variation in driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If system intervenes when driver maneuver differs from automated control, then accident risk reduces, but driver autonomy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident riskVSAvoiddriver autonomy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides advance warning notifications to drivers when their maneuvers deviate from automated driving system controls, allowing drivers to correct their actions before hazardous situations develop. This preliminary anti-action approach reduces accident risk by proactively alerting drivers to potential errors while preserving autonomy, as the system suggests corrections rather than forcibly overriding driver control unless deviations become severe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its intervention strategy based on the magnitude and persistence of driver deviations. For minor or temporary deviations, the system provides gentle feedback notifications that preserve driver autonomy. For severe or persistent deviations that pose safety risks, the system can escalate to more assertive interventions or take control, creating a dynamic balance between safety and autonomy that adapts to the specific driving context and driver behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10442443B1Providing driver feedback
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10442443B1 patent drawing
  • US10442443B1 patent drawing
  • US10442443B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technical solutions are described for providing a driver performance feedback to a driver of a vehicle. An example method includes receiving, by a controller, a first maneuver control from an automated driving system of the vehicle. The method further includes receiving, by the controller, a second maneuver control from the driver. The method further includes, in response to the first maneuver control being different from the second maneuver control, generating a driver notification that is indicative of the first maneuver control from the automated driving system, and operating the vehicle using the second maneuver control.