Automated Driving Transition Control at Private-Public Road Boundaries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver assistance systems face challenges in seamlessly transitioning from private to public areas during automated driving, leading to potential unnecessary stopping and safety hazards due to legal restrictions and varying traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

The system detects transitions from private to public areas, acquires additional traffic data, and uses this information to continue automated driving or transfer control to the driver, ensuring a smooth transition by evaluating sensor data and external sources like GPS and communication with other vehicles and infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the driver assistance system automatically stops the vehicle when transitioning from private to public areas, then legal compliance is improved, but driving continuity and safety are worsened due to unexpected stops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal complianceVSAvoiddriving continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by acquiring additional traffic data and preparing transition strategies before actually entering the public area. This allows the system to comply with legal restrictions while maintaining driving continuity through proactive planning and data collection about the upcoming transition zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the transition state. Instead of a static stop-and-go approach, the system continuously evaluates traffic data and adapts its driving strategy in real-time, allowing for smooth transitions that comply with legal requirements while maintaining operational continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system acquires additional traffic data from multiple sources, then decision accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a multi-functional evaluation unit that can process various types of data (sensor data, map data, traffic data) through a single integrated decision-making mechanism. This universal approach improves decision accuracy by considering multiple data sources while avoiding the need for separate complex processing systems for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple data acquisition functions into a unified data processing framework. By combining sensor data, map data, and traffic data into a single evaluation process, the system achieves high decision accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same hardware resources serve multiple data collection purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the system continuously monitors traffic conditions in public areas, then safety is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic monitoring of traffic conditions rather than continuous monitoring. By evaluating traffic data at strategically timed intervals and based on transition relevance, the system maintains safety through regular updates while reducing energy consumption by avoiding constant data acquisition and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies differentiated monitoring intensity based on local conditions. Instead of uniformly monitoring all public areas with the same intensity, the system adjusts its monitoring frequency and depth according to the specific traffic situation, transition zone characteristics, and safety requirements of each local context, thereby optimizing energy usage while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11801859B2Driver assistance system
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 VALEO SCHALTER & SENSOREN GMBH
  • US11801859B2 patent drawing
  • US11801859B2 patent drawing
  • US11801859B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a driver assistance system for a motor vehicle driven in an at least partially automated manner includes learning a trajectory in a learning mode for driving the vehicle in a first automated manner along the trajectory. Subsequently, the vehicle is driven in the first automated manner along the learnt trajectory in an operating mode following the learning mode. While the vehicle is being driven along the trajectory in the operating mode, at least one transition from a private area to a public area is detected. Additional data, including current traffic data related to driving the vehicle in the public area, is acquired and provided for the driver assistance system. The motor vehicle is driven along the learnt trajectory in a second automated manner in the public area using the additional data.