Automated E-Discovery System for Custodian Identification and Data Preservation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of electronic discovery (e-discovery) is time-consuming and expensive due to the complexity of identifying custodians, preserving, collecting, processing, reviewing, analyzing, producing, presenting, and disposing of electronically stored information (ESI) relevant to legal discovery requests, particularly in institutions with vast volumes of data across various devices and locations.

Innovation Solution

An end-to-end system and method that includes an identification phase to determine the scope and breadth of the discovery request, a preservation phase to document custodian information and place litigation holds, a collection phase to gather and image data, a processing phase to convert and index data, a review phase to mark and redact privileged data, an analysis phase to categorize and report findings, a production phase to prepare data for delivery, a presentation phase to present data in legal proceedings, and a disposition phase to archive and dispose of data after the case is closed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual methods are used for identifying custodians and collecting ESI, then data can be preserved and collected, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata preservation reliabilityVSAvoide-discovery process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (personally interviewing custodians, manual data collection, physical document review) with automated computer-based systems including software agents, electronic discovery platforms, and automated processing tools that can identify custodians, collect ESI, and review documents at machine speed without human intervention for routine tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated custodian identification algorithms that independently analyze organizational data to identify potential custodians without manual input, automated data collection agents that autonomously gather ESI from multiple sources, and self-directed document review processes where the system pre-sorts and prioritizes documents for reviewer attention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If comprehensive data collection is performed across all devices and locations, then complete ESI is captured, but the complexity of the process increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of ESI capturedVSAvoide-discovery process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex e-discovery process into distinct automated phases: custodian identification, data source mapping, ESI collection, processing, review, and production. Each phase is handled by specialized software modules that operate independently but coordinate through a centralized platform, reducing overall process complexity while maintaining comprehensive data capture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs universal data collection agents and processing tools that can operate across multiple device types (computers, mobile devices, cloud storage), data formats, and storage locations simultaneously. The automated platform provides a single unified interface that manages diverse data sources through standardized protocols, eliminating the need for separate complex procedures for each data type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If manual review and analysis of all ESI is conducted, then thorough legal review is achieved, but costs and time requirements increase dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal review accuracyVSAvoiddocument review efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial automated review by using software agents to conduct initial document analysis, keyword searching, and relevance screening before human review. This pre-processing filters out clearly non-relevant documents, allowing human reviewers to focus only on potentially responsive materials, thereby maintaining high accuracy while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated review system incorporates feedback loops where initial automated analysis results are reviewed and corrected by attorneys, and these corrections feed back into the system to refine and improve future automated review accuracy. The system learns from human reviewer decisions to enhance its algorithms, maintaining precision while reducing manual workload over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9495412B1Technical electronic discovery action model
Publication Date: 2016.11.15 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US9495412B1 patent drawing
  • US9495412B1 patent drawing
  • US9495412B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide for an end-to-end system and method for identifying custodians, preserving, collecting, processing, reviewing, analyzing, producing, presenting, and dispositioning data responsive to a legal discovery request.