Automated Emergency Power Supply Testing via Software Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual testing of emergency power supply systems (EPSS) is inefficient and costly, often leading to insufficient testing and potential failures during emergencies due to challenges in coordinating comprehensive tests and accurately measuring results, which can result in irreversible engine damage and even loss of life.

Innovation Solution

An automated EPSS testing system that continuously monitors and records engine parameters such as exhaust temperature, engine loading, oil pressure, and battery health, using intelligent electronic devices to identify potential issues before emergencies and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual testing procedures are used for EPSS, then personnel can perform tests with basic equipment, but the testing process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtime for coordination and measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical testing procedures with an automated computer-based system that electronically monitors and records test parameters. The automated EPSS testing system uses software to coordinate tests, track generator performance, and measure results without requiring manual intervention for each measurement, thereby dramatically improving testing efficiency and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated testing system performs self-monitoring and self-recording of test parameters. The system automatically tracks engine temperature, load conditions, and other critical parameters without requiring external personnel to manually record each value, enabling the system to serve itself during the testing process and reducing personnel time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive manual tests are performed on EPSS, then more thorough testing is achieved, but coordination becomes difficult and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting completenessVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated testing system serves multiple functions through a single integrated platform: it coordinates test scheduling, monitors multiple parameters simultaneously (temperature, load, runtime), records results, and generates reports. This multi-functional system eliminates the need for separate coordination efforts for each testing aspect, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive testing coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automatic feedback mechanisms that monitor test parameters in real-time and provide alerts when parameters deviate from acceptable ranges. This feedback loop ensures comprehensive testing by automatically adjusting monitoring based on system responses, maintaining reliability without requiring complex manual coordination to interpret and respond to test conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If generators are tested frequently to ensure reliability, then backup power availability is improved, but wet-stacking conditions can occur due to insufficient run time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup power availabilityVSAvoidwet-stacking damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system dynamically adjusts test parameters based on real-time monitoring of generator conditions. Rather than using fixed test durations, the system continuously evaluates engine temperature, load conditions, and runtime to determine when testing should continue or conclude. This dynamic approach ensures tests are long enough to prevent wet-stacking while maintaining reliability through frequent, optimized testing intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of critical parameters before and during testing to predict potential wet-stacking conditions. By tracking engine temperature rise rates and load conditions in advance, the system can adjust test duration or intensity to stay within safe operating parameters, preventing harmful effects before they occur while still achieving comprehensive reliability testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2636121B1Automated emergency power supply test
Publication Date: 2018.01.24 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA INC
  • EP2636121B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2636121B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2636121B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

An automated emergency power supply system (EPSS) and testing solution that records generator load values and engine exhaust temperature values to evaluate whether an EPSS test satisfies legislated test criteria. The EPSS test is carried out under software control, which initiates a test by instructing an automatic transfer switch (ATS) to change its status to a test status, causing the essential loads to be powered by a generator instead of a main utility power source. Power monitors record the ATS and generator status during the test as well as electrical parameter data from the ATS and generator and exhaust temperature data and other engine parameter data from the generator. When the test is concluded, the ATS is instructed to return the status to normal so that power delivery is resumed from the main power source. The electrical and engine parameter data is analyzed and compared against legislated test criteria to determine a pass/fail result of the EPSS test.