Automated GUI Generation from Printed Algorithm Publications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software development challenges include the difficulty in programming accurate and efficient code for various platforms and operating systems, particularly due to limitations in existing resources such as printed and electronic publications, which lack executable code and often require manual GUI implementation, leading to inefficiencies and errors in evaluating and deploying algorithms.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically generating graphical user interfaces (GUIs) based on computational algorithms described in printed publications, involving indexing, caching, and analyzing algorithm-indicating information to generate executable code for displaying GUI elements, thereby reducing manual effort and increasing testing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual code implementation and GUI creation is performed for algorithms in printed publications, then code accuracy and platform compatibility can be achieved, but development time and error rates increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses containerization to create executable copies of algorithms from printed publications. The container includes the algorithm code, dependencies, and configuration, allowing direct execution without manual re-implementation. This copying approach maintains code accuracy while eliminating time-consuming manual translation and testing across platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring the container with all necessary components (code, dependencies, environment variables) before execution. The system automatically analyzes the printed publication, extracts algorithm information, and prepares the executable container in advance, eliminating the need for manual code implementation and platform-specific adaptation during the development phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If executable code is provided in printed publications, then code evaluation and integration become easier, but compatibility with different software applications and projects is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode integration easeVSAvoidplatform compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality through containerization, where a single container can execute across multiple platforms and software environments. The container encapsulates the algorithm with all its dependencies and configuration, making it universally adaptable to different software applications, cloud infrastructures, and operating systems without requiring platform-specific modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If graphical user interfaces are manually implemented for algorithms, then custom GUI requirements can be met, but development complexity and error-proneness increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveGUI customizationVSAvoidGUI development complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the container to automatically generate and configure its own GUI based on the algorithm's requirements. The system analyzes the algorithm description in the printed publication and automatically creates the necessary interface elements, eliminating the need for manual GUI implementation while reducing complexity and errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If code is extracted and executed from printed publications, then algorithm evaluation becomes possible, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses containerization to create faithful copies of the algorithm as described in the printed publication. The container preserves the original algorithm's logic and behavior, enabling accurate evaluation and testing without manual re-implementation errors, while the automated extraction and execution process significantly reduces evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11315436B2Method and system for automatically providing graphical user interfaces for computational algorithms described in printed publications
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 THE JOAN & IRWIN JACOBS TECHNION CORNELL INST
  • US11315436B2 patent drawing
  • US11315436B2 patent drawing
  • US11315436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for providing graphical user interfaces based on computational algorithms described in printed publications. The method includes indexing a first output generated by a container; caching the indexed output in a cache memory; analyzing the printed publication to determine algorithm-indicating information of the computational algorithm; identifying, in the algorithm-indicating information, at least one input and at least one second output; generating at least one GUI element, wherein generating the at least one GUI element includes identifying an association between the printed publication and the container, wherein generating the at least one GUI element further comprises retrieving the first output from the cache memory, wherein the at least one GUI element is generated based on the retrieved first output; and generating executable code, wherein the executable code includes instructions for causing a display of the GUI including the at least one GUI element.