Automated Hard Tag Applicator for Safe High-Throughput Tagging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for applying Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) security tags to items are manual and labor-intensive, involving holding a tag body and retaining pin, which increases labor costs, safety concerns, and inventory complexity.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated or automated tag applicator system that aligns and applies tags to items using a tag feeder, securement mechanism driver, and sensors, eliminating manual handling and enabling efficient tracking and inventory management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual tagging method is used (holding tag body and retaining pin), then flexibility and simplicity are maintained, but labor costs increase and safety concerns arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation simplicityVSAvoidtagging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tag applicator is designed to automatically perform the tagging operation without requiring manual handling of tags and pins. The device feeds tags from a magazine, positions them automatically, and applies them to items through automated mechanical action, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous human intervention for each tagging operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical system (human hands holding and manipulating tag components) with an automated mechanical system (motor-driven tag feeder, positioning mechanisms, and application mechanisms). This substitution maintains the mechanical nature of tagging while eliminating the need for manual dexterity and continuous human operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If manual tagging method is used, then device complexity is low, but labor costs and inventory complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging device structureVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tag applicator is divided into distinct functional modules: a tag magazine for storage, a feed mechanism for tag delivery, a positioning system for alignment, and an application mechanism for attaching tags to items. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together as an integrated system, reducing overall operational complexity despite increased device capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated tag applicator is designed to handle multiple tag types and various item configurations through adjustable positioning and feeding mechanisms. This multi-functionality allows a single device to replace multiple manual tagging operations, simplifying inventory management and reducing the need for specialized equipment for different tagging scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated tag applicator is used, then productivity and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging speed and efficiencyVSAvoidautomated system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Tags are pre-loaded into a magazine in the correct orientation and arrangement before the tagging operation begins. The feed mechanism is pre-configured to deliver tags in the proper sequence and position, eliminating the need for real-time manual manipulation during the high-speed automated tagging process. This preliminary preparation enables faster and more consistent productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate components such as a tag guide, positioning fingers, and transfer mechanisms that mediate between the tag storage and the application point. These intermediaries simplify the complex coordination required between different automated subsystems by providing standardized interfaces and controlled transition zones for tag movement and positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual handling of tags is required, then adaptability to different tag types is maintained, but labor intensity and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag type flexibilityVSAvoidsafety concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The tag applicator incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable components that can dynamically adapt to different tag types and sizes. The feeding mechanism, positioning system, and application force can be modified based on the specific tag being used, allowing the automated system to maintain versatility while eliminating exposure to safety hazards associated with manual tag handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces labor costs and safety risks by automating the tagging process, improving inventory management, and ensuring accurate and efficient application of tags, while minimizing waste and simplifying shipping and distribution.

Implementation Method 1

allowing the tag to travel out of the tag feeder and into the cavity as a result of gravitational force being applied to the tag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11138850B2Hard tag applicator
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US11138850B2 patent drawing
  • US11138850B2 patent drawing
  • US11138850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for coupling a tag to an item. The methods comprise: dispensing the tag from a tag feeder of a tag applicator; performing first operations by the tag applicator to mechanically move the tag into a nest of the tag applicator; determining if a given criteria is met based on feedback information received from at least one of a user of the tag applicator and a sensor provided with the tag applicator; and performing second operations by the tag applicator to couple the tag to the item, when a determination is made that the given criteria is met.