Automated HEMP Shielding Test System for Remote Enclosure Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting and protecting against high-altitude electromagnetic pulses (HEMP) are challenging due to the difficulty in conducting remote and automated testing, especially in inaccessible locations, which can lead to inadequate shielding effectiveness and potential damage to electronic devices and communications systems.

Innovation Solution

A remotely controlled, automated shielding effectiveness test system that performs a series of sub-tests, including compression, environment, and final shielding effectiveness tests, using a network analyzer and statistical analysis to assess and improve the HEMP shielding of enclosures, allowing for remote maintenance and detection of defects or tampering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If remote and automated testing is implemented for HEMP shielding detection, then accessibility to inaccessible locations is improved, but testing complexity and system requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccessibility to inaccessible locationsVSAvoidTesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system performs automated self-diagnosis and shielding effectiveness evaluation without requiring human operators to physically access the enclosure. The system autonomously conducts compression tests, environment tests, and final shielding effectiveness tests, processing results automatically to determine pass/fail outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual physical inspection and testing with electronic and electromagnetic-based automated measurement systems. Network analyzers and signal generators conduct non-contact electromagnetic field measurements to assess shielding effectiveness, eliminating the need for physical access and manual testing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive shielding effectiveness testing is performed, then detection accuracy of defects and tampering is improved, but testing time and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDetection accuracy of defects and tamperingVSAvoidTesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive shielding effectiveness test is divided into three distinct sub-tests: compression test (establishing baseline response), environment test (simulating operational conditions), and final shielding effectiveness test (comparing results to determine pass/fail). This segmentation allows systematic evaluation of different aspects of shielding performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compression test is performed first to establish the baseline electromagnetic response of the enclosure under controlled conditions. This preliminary measurement provides reference data that is later compared against the final shielding effectiveness test results, enabling accurate detection of defects or tampering without requiring repeated comprehensive measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If automated testing systems are deployed for remote monitoring, then ongoing shielding effectiveness monitoring is improved, but system cost and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOngoing shielding effectiveness monitoringVSAvoidRemote monitoring system infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically compares the electromagnetic field measurements from the compression test and the final shielding effectiveness test, generating feedback that indicates whether the shielding effectiveness has degraded. This feedback mechanism enables ongoing monitoring to detect defects, tampering, or deterioration of the shielding enclosure over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated testing system is designed to perform multiple functions: conducting compression tests, environment tests, final shielding effectiveness tests, analyzing results, and generating pass/fail determinations. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single integrated remote monitoring solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides accurate, remote, and automated assessment of HEMP shielding effectiveness, detecting defects and anomalies, and ensuring the protection of electronic devices and communications systems from HEMP, thereby enhancing their reliability and security.

Implementation Method 1

A remotely controlled, automated shielding effectiveness test system... performs a series of sub-tests, including compression, environment, and final shielding effectiveness tests, using a network analyzer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic signal transmission and attenuation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11782080B2Remotely controlled, automated shielding effectiveness test system for high-altitude electromagnetic pulse detection
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 JAXON ENG & MAINTENANCE LLC
  • US11782080B2 patent drawing
  • US11782080B2 patent drawing
  • US11782080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a remotely controlled, automated shielding effectiveness test system for hardening against the effects of high altitude electromagnetic pulses. The system monitors and reports the on-going effectiveness of an enclosure that shields electronic devices and communications systems from electromagnetic pulses. The system reports provide information to a user to determine whether corrective action is needed for the enclosure to ensure continued protection of the electronic devices and communications systems within the enclosure. The system comprises providing a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) enclosure enclosing at least an electronic device, and an electronic testing apparatus for testing effectiveness of HEMP shielding of the enclosure; and performing a shielding effectiveness test by the apparatus on the enclosure, comprising a first compression sub-test, a second environment sub-test, and a third final shielding effectiveness sub-test.