Automated ID Validation for Financial Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for money transfer transactions face challenges in confirming the validity of identification documents presented by individuals, particularly due to the variety of identification types and potential for fraudulent use of false IDs, which can hinder efforts to prevent illegal or unethical transactions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that involve receiving identification information at a transaction device, transmitting it to a host computer system for verification, and utilizing identity verification systems such as databases and biometric checks to assess the validity of the ID, including risk scoring and determining its acceptability for the transaction, while also considering the location and type of ID.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple types of identification documents are accepted to accommodate diverse customer needs, then the ease of operation and customer convenience improve, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring validity increases due to varying formats and fraud risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of identification acceptanceVSAvoiddifficulty of validating identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of identification validation from manual visual inspection to automated digital verification. By converting physical ID documents into digital formats with standardized data fields (name, date of birth, ID number, expiration date), the system maintains acceptance of diverse ID types while enabling automated validation through database cross-referencing and format verification, thus resolving the contradiction between accommodating diverse IDs and ensuring valid detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification system that acts as a mediator between the customer's identification document and the transaction processing. This intermediary system includes database connections to verify ID authenticity, cross-reference against watch lists, and validate document formats, thereby enabling automated validation of diverse identification types without requiring manual inspection of each document type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If strict identification verification procedures are implemented to prevent illegal transactions, then the reliability and security improve, but the device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of transaction verificationVSAvoidcomplexity of verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system is segmented into distinct functional modules: document format validation, database cross-referencing, watch list screening, and risk scoring. Each module handles a specific aspect of verification independently, which reduces overall system complexity by breaking down the complex verification process into manageable, specialized components that can be processed sequentially or in parallel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing database connections to identification authorities, pre-loading watch lists and sanctioned individual databases, and pre-defining validation rules for different ID types. This preliminary preparation enables faster real-time verification during transactions, reducing processing time while maintaining high reliability through comprehensive pre-validated verification protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If comprehensive identification verification is performed to reduce fraudulent transactions, then the security against harmful factors improves, but the loss of time in transaction processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against fraudulent transactionsVSAvoidtime for identification verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system uses periodic action by implementing risk-based verification thresholds and time-limited validation processes. For low-risk transactions, verification is streamlined with shorter time limits, while high-risk transactions trigger more comprehensive checks. The system periodically updates verification rules and database connections, enabling efficient processing of most transactions while maintaining security through targeted intensive verification when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial verification action by performing only the necessary level of verification based on transaction risk assessment. For routine transactions below certain thresholds, basic format validation and database checks are sufficient. For transactions approaching or exceeding thresholds, the system performs excessive verification including watch list screening and extended validation, thereby reducing average processing time while maintaining protection against fraud through selective comprehensive verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7844545B2Systems and methods for validating identifications in financial transactions
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 WESTERN UNION CO
  • US7844545B2 patent drawing
  • US7844545B2 patent drawing
  • US7844545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of confirming the validity of an identification presented by an individual in a financial transaction includes receiving transaction information at a transaction device that is usable to perform the financial transaction. The method also includes determining the need for identification information based at least in part on the transaction information. The method further includes receiving identification information at the transaction device. The identification information is obtained from an identification of the individual and the identification information has a format. The method also includes transmitting the identification information to a host computer system. At the host computer system and based at least in part on the format of the identification information, the validity of the identification from which the identification information was obtained is accessed.