Automated Image Analysis for Property Damage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process for processing property damage insurance claims is labor-intensive, costly, slow, and unsafe, with manual on-site inspections by adjusters often resulting in inconsistent assessments and delays, especially after catastrophic events.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes an imaging device, processing device, and data storage facility, which automatically processes images to determine if they depict damage consistent with a specific incident type, using image processing criteria to assess claims and generate commands for processing or further inspection, potentially involving aerial drones for safer data collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual on-site inspection by adjusters is used, then detailed damage assessment can be performed, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidclaims processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual inspection process with an automated image processing system. The system uses image analysis algorithms to automatically detect, classify, and measure damage from photographs, eliminating the need for manual measurement and assessment while maintaining accuracy. This substitution directly resolves the contradiction by enabling fast automated processing without sacrificing assessment quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates digital copies of the damaged property through photographs and uses these copies for automated analysis. Instead of requiring physical presence and manual measurement, the system processes visual replicas of the damage, enabling remote automated assessment that is both rapid and accurate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If adjusters manually survey and measure damage on-site, then detailed information can be collected, but the process becomes costly and slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage information completenessVSAvoidinspection duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual data collection with automated image processing. Algorithms automatically extract damage information from photographs, including type, location, and extent of damage, eliminating the time-consuming manual survey process while preserving complete damage information through systematic image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary damage assessment through automated image processing before any manual intervention is required. The system pre-analyzes images to identify damage characteristics, enabling faster subsequent processing and reducing the overall time required for complete claims handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If adjusters climb ladders and roofs to inspect damage, then comprehensive assessment is possible, but safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the dangerous physical act of climbing with remote image processing. The system analyzes photographs already captured of the damaged areas, eliminating the need for adjusters to physically access hazardous locations while maintaining assessment accuracy through automated image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses photographs as an intermediary between the adjuster and the damaged property. Instead of direct physical contact with hazardous areas, the adjuster captures images from safe distances, and the automated system processes these images to assess damage, thereby eliminating safety risks while preserving assessment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If multiple adjusters are deployed to handle high claims volume after catastrophic events, then claims processing capacity increases, but labor costs and coordination complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaims processing capacityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human adjusters with an automated image processing system that can handle unlimited claims simultaneously. The system processes images through automated algorithms without requiring coordination between multiple human workers, thereby increasing capacity while eliminating coordination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal processing system that handles all types of damage claims through the same automated image analysis pipeline. The system performs multiple functions (detection, classification, measurement, estimation) within a single integrated platform, enabling high-volume processing without the coordination overhead of multiple specialized adjusters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Productivity

If manual assessment by multiple adjusters is used, then claims can be processed, but assessment consistency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaims processing throughputVSAvoidassessment consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human judgment with automated algorithmic processing. The same image analysis algorithms are applied consistently to all claims, eliminating variations in assessment quality that arise from different adjusters' expertise and judgment. This ensures uniform assessment standards across high volumes of claims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms subjective human assessment into objective measurable parameters through automated image analysis. The system quantifies damage characteristics using consistent computational metrics, replacing variable human judgment with stable algorithmic measurements that produce consistent results across all claims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10511676B2Image analysis system for property damage assessment and verification
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES LLC
  • US10511676B2 patent drawing
  • US10511676B2 patent drawing
  • US10511676B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for assessing a property damage claim uses an imaging device to capture images of a property that has reportedly been damaged by an incident. The system receives a property damage incident type, along with image processing criteria for processing images that are associated with the incident type. The system automatically processes the images according to the image processing criteria to identify one or more characteristics in the images and, based on the identified characteristics, determines whether certain claim processing criteria are satisfied. The claim processing criteria may help the system determine whether the property actually was damaged by the reported incident. The system will generate a command to process the property damage claim only if the system determines that one or more images show that the claim processing criteria are satisfied.