Automated Image Product Design System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of designing personalized image products, such as photobooks, is time-consuming and labor-intensive for users, requiring multiple iterative steps to select images, choose layouts, and arrange content, which can be overwhelming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method where a computer system automatically identifies and arranges images based on user-provided specifications, selecting a style and format, and creating a design for image products like photobooks without user request, allowing users to preview and edit before ordering a physical copy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If users manually design image products through iterative steps (selecting images, layouts, backgrounds, text), then customization and personalization are achieved, but time consumption and effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct customizationVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically selecting images, layouts, backgrounds, and text before the user reviews the design. The computer system proactively creates complete design proposals based on user input, eliminating the need for users to perform these selection tasks manually. This resolves the contradiction by automating preparatory work while preserving customization options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service design generation where the computer automatically creates image product designs based on user input without requiring manual intervention for each design element. The system serves itself by autonomously selecting and arranging design components, reducing user effort and time investment while maintaining personalized output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If the system automatically creates image product designs without user requests, then productivity and time efficiency improve, but user control and intent alignment may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign creation speedVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by presenting automatically generated designs to users for review, allowing users to approve, reject, or request modifications. This feedback loop ensures that automated design creation aligns with user intent while maintaining high productivity. The system adapts to user preferences based on feedback, resolving the contradiction between automation speed and user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of automation based on user interaction. Users can control the degree of manual involvement at different stages of the design process, allowing flexibility between fully automated and fully manual approaches. This dynamic control resolves the contradiction by enabling users to optimize between productivity and control based on their specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive design options (multiple layouts, backgrounds, styles) are provided for user selection, then product quality and personalization improve, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the complexity of design selection from the user interface by automatically handling layout, background, and style selections. Instead of presenting users with complex menus and options, the system takes out these decision-making tasks and performs them automatically, maintaining design quality while reducing interface complexity and improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If users review and edit automatically generated designs before ordering, then design accuracy and user satisfaction improve, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by allowing users to review only the most critical aspects of automatically generated designs rather than requiring complete manual verification. Users can quickly approve designs that meet their expectations without extensive editing, reducing review time while maintaining sufficient design accuracy. This resolves the contradiction by eliminating unnecessary review steps for high-quality automated outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240004926A1Proactive creation of image-based products
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 SHUTTERFLY LLC
  • US20240004926A1 patent drawing
  • US20240004926A1 patent drawing
  • US20240004926A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for proactively creating an image product includes capturing an image of an object in a first environment by a device, storing a library of personalized products each characterized by a product type, automatically recognizing the object in the image as having a product type associated with the library of personalized products, automatically creating a design for the personalized product of the product type using personalized content, automatically displaying the design of the personalized product of the product type incorporating the selected photo in the first environment on the device, and manufacturing a physical product based on the design of the personalized product.