Automated Imaging Plan Generation for Radiation Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current methods for selecting imaging parameters and units in particle and radiation therapy are labor-intensive and prone to errors, relying solely on medical staff and lacking automation, which hampers efficient patient throughput and treatment planning.

Innovation Solution

An automated method and device using an evaluation module to determine imaging unit parameters and settings based on stored functional relationships and input data, including patient and tumor characteristics, to create an optimized imaging plan, which can be updated continuously with new data for improved accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated planning is implemented, then patient throughput is increased and human error is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation module automatically determines imaging parameters and unit selections based on stored functional relationships and input data, enabling the system to plan treatments independently without requiring manual intervention from medical staff for each parameter selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Functional relationships and imaging parameters are pre-stored in the evaluation module before treatment planning, allowing the system to retrieve and apply appropriate parameters automatically during the planning process without requiring real-time manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual selection of imaging parameters is used, then device complexity is kept low, but treatment planning time increases and accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging parameter accuracyVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical process of selecting imaging parameters is replaced with an automated electronic evaluation module that processes input data and determines parameters based on stored functional relationships, significantly reducing planning time while maintaining or improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses stored functional relationships that are updated based on experience and results, creating a feedback loop where the evaluation module continuously improves its parameter selection accuracy by learning from past treatment outcomes and imaging results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8897417B2Method and device for planning a treatment
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 VARIAN MEDICAL SYST PARTICLE THERAPY GMBH & CO KG
  • US8897417B2 patent drawing
  • US8897417B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for planning an irradiation is provided. The device includes an evaluation module with an input for receiving input data, a memory and an output for outputting determined output data. The evaluation module is designed for using the input data that includes the type and number of the imaging units present, variables characterizing the tumor and/or variables characterizing the patient, in order to determine the output data that includes the type of the imaging unit, the frequency of use of the imaging unit and/or the parameters for setting the imaging unit to be used in the form of an imaging plan with the aid of a functional relationship, which is based on experience, stored in the memory.