Automated Insect Breeding System with Segmented Mating Cages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insect breeding technologies lack a comprehensive and automated system for optimizing the mating process and egg collection in insect breeding, particularly for Dipteran insects, as existing systems do not provide detailed control over environmental conditions or operations in the reproduction chamber, leading to suboptimal egg yield and inefficient processes.

Innovation Solution

An automated process and system that includes a mating cage connected to an emergence chamber, with controlled time intervals for filling, ovipositing, and stopping ovipositing, along with adjustable conditions for promoting mating and oviposition, allowing for calibration and optimization of egg yield, and enabling the reuse of mating cages in sanitary conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated control is implemented for population filling and oviposition management, then productivity and egg yield are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveegg yieldVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The breeding system is divided into separate functional modules: emergence chambers for insect development, mating cages for reproduction, and collection systems for eggs. Each module operates independently with optimized conditions, allowing automated control without requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes the insects' natural behaviors (emergence, mating, oviposition) to drive the process automatically. Insects self-regulate population dynamics and egg production based on environmental conditions, reducing the need for active intervention while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If time intervals are optimized for oviposition promotion, then egg yield is improved, but loss of time in calibration and setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedaily egg productionVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, lighting) are pre-configured in mating cages to promote oviposition. Oviposition devices are pre-positioned before insects are introduced, and time intervals are pre-determined based on insect biology, eliminating the need for extensive calibration during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, photoperiod) based on the insect life cycle stage and oviposition timing. By changing these parameters according to predetermined schedules, the system optimizes egg yield without requiring time-consuming calibration for each batch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If mating cages are reused after cleaning, then loss of substance and resource efficiency are improved, but ease of operation increases due to additional cleaning steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of discarding mating cages after use, the system recovers and reuses them after automated cleaning. The cleaning process removes organic matter and pathogens, restoring the cages to sanitary conditions for the next breeding cycle, thereby reducing waste and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning and preparation of mating cages is integrated into the continuous breeding operation. While one batch completes oviposition, cleaning processes begin in parallel, ensuring that cages are ready for reuse without interrupting the overall production flow, maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Manufacturing precision

If environmental conditions are strictly controlled for oviposition, then manufacturing precision of egg quality is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveegg quality controlVSAvoidenergy for environmental control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Environmental control is applied locally in mating cages rather than throughout the entire facility. Each cage maintains specific conditions (temperature, humidity, lighting) optimized for oviposition, while other areas operate with less stringent controls, reducing overall energy consumption while ensuring egg quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240164356A1Process for breeding adult insects
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 NASEKOMO BV
  • US20240164356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240164356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240164356A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated process for breeding insects at their imaginal stage in at least one mating cage, comprises the steps of: providing at least one emergence chamber comprising a population of newly emerged insects; automatically successively: connecting at least one emergence chamber with at least one mating cage, filling the at least one mating cage with at least part of the population of newly emerged insects during a first time interval T1, and disconnecting the at least one mating cage and the at least one emergence chamber; providing conditions within the at least one mating cage suitable for promoting ovipositing during a second time interval T2; stopping ovipositing during a third time interval T3.