Automated Image Signal Processor Tuning Using Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image signal processors (ISPs) require extensive manual parameter tuning, which is time-consuming and costly, making it difficult to achieve user-satisfactory image quality efficiently.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device employs an image evaluation model and a tuning model, utilizing reinforcement learning, to automatically determine key features and adjust parameters for optimal image processing, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving processing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If engineers manually analyze and adjust thousands of parameters in the image processing pipeline, then image quality can be optimized, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs an automated reinforcement learning-based tuning mechanism that enables the image signal processor to self-optimize its parameters. The RL agent autonomously explores the parameter space, evaluates image quality using the evaluation model, and learns optimal parameter configurations without requiring manual engineer intervention for each parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of parameter analysis and adjustment with an automated computational system. The reinforcement learning agent uses computational algorithms to navigate the parameter space, while the image evaluation model uses automated image quality assessment to provide feedback, eliminating the need for manual visual inspection and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If engineers directly analyze and adjust each parameter individually, then parameter optimization is achieved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimizationVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the parameter optimization process into distinct functional components: the reinforcement learning agent handles the search and optimization logic, while the image evaluation model handles the quality assessment. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its function, improving overall efficiency compared to manual analysis of each parameter individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the image evaluation model continuously assesses the output images and provides feedback to the reinforcement learning agent. This feedback mechanism enables the agent to learn from results and iteratively improve parameter configurations, achieving efficient optimization without requiring sequential manual analysis of each parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250316071A1Method for tuning image signal processor and electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250316071A1 patent drawing
  • US20250316071A1 patent drawing
  • US20250316071A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of tuning an image signal processor by an electronic device includes: obtaining an image evaluation model for receiving an image and outputting an evaluation on the image; determining key features of the image based on the image evaluation model; determining a parameter list based on the key features; and training, based on the parameter list and the image evaluation model, a tuning model for receiving an image and outputting a parameter adjustment set, wherein the tuning model is a reinforcement learning model.