Automated Highway Lane Management for AV Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing road designs and traffic control systems are inadequate for managing a mixture of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles, particularly in controlling mode switching, merging, diverging, overtaking, and emergency management on automated lanes.

Innovation Solution

A road design and traffic control system for connected and automated vehicle highway (CAVH) systems, incorporating subsystems for vehicle mode control, merging, diverging, and overtaking, as well as emergency management, utilizing buffer zones, mode switching zones, and dynamic lane markings, with communication between vehicles and infrastructure to manage AVs and human-driven vehicles on dedicated lanes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dedicated automated lanes are introduced for AVs, then traffic flow efficiency and safety are improved, but road design complexity and infrastructure costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow efficiencyVSAvoidroad design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The highway is segmented into dedicated automated lanes and conventional lanes, with automated lanes specifically designated for AVs. This segmentation allows optimized traffic flow management for different vehicle types while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic lane management where lane assignments and traffic control parameters can change in real-time based on traffic conditions, AV density, and operational requirements. This dynamic approach optimizes productivity without requiring permanent complex infrastructure changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If mode switching zones and buffer zones are implemented, then safe transition between driving modes is achieved, but road length and infrastructure complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode switching safetyVSAvoidroad segment length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Mode switching zones and buffer zones are established in advance at strategic locations where transitions between automated and manual driving modes are anticipated. This preliminary preparation ensures safe transitions without requiring excessive road length, as the zones are placed only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than making the entire road system complex, the patent applies specialized zones (mode switching zones, buffer zones) only at specific locations where transitions are needed. The majority of the highway maintains standard design, thus minimizing overall infrastructure complexity while ensuring safety at critical transition points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive traffic control subsystems are deployed, then vehicle management and emergency response are improved, but system complexity and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency response capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traffic control subsystem is designed to perform multiple functions including mode switching management, merging/diverging control, emergency response, and real-time monitoring. This multi-functional approach improves adaptability and emergency response capability without requiring separate specialized systems for each function, thus managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the central controller receives real-time data from vehicles and infrastructure sensors, processes this information, and adjusts traffic control decisions dynamically. This feedback mechanism enables comprehensive vehicle management and emergency response while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12424101B2Systems and methods for connected and automated vehicle highway systems dedicated lane management and control
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 CAVH LLC
  • US12424101B2 patent drawing
  • US12424101B2 patent drawing
  • US12424101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein is technology relating to roadway design and traffic control systems and methods for connected and automated vehicle and highway (CAVH) systems, and particularly, but not exclusively, to systems and methods for controlling switching of vehicles between automated mode and human-driven mode, systems and methods for vehicle merging, diverging, and overtaking on automated lanes of multiple lane highways, systems and methods for emergency management and roadside assistance on automated lanes, and/or systems and methods for managing automated vehicle lanes on urban major and minor expressways.