Automated Leveling Support Structure with Segmented Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tripods and support structures face challenges in providing a stable, level platform for heavy loads while being portable, compact, and easy to install, especially in environments with uneven surfaces, requiring improved dynamic planarity adjustment and automation for precision leveling.

Innovation Solution

A support structure with a central load-bearing member and radially offset leveling assemblies that include automated actuation systems, allowing for both gross and fine positioning adjustments, facilitated by a control system that reduces operator interaction and enhances stability and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional tripods use manual adjustment mechanisms for platform leveling, then the structure remains simple and portable, but the precision and speed of leveling adjustment are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleveling precisionVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The leveling adjustment mechanism is segmented into two distinct systems: a manual gross positioning mechanism for coarse adjustments and an automated fine positioning mechanism for precision leveling. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized independently, achieving high precision without requiring the entire system to be complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated fine positioning mechanism as an intermediary between the manual gross positioning and the final platform level. This intermediary component handles the precision adjustment task, freeing the manual mechanism from precision requirements while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If tripods are designed with robust construction for heavy loads, then load capacity increases, but portability and ease of installation decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacityVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment operations with an automated fine positioning mechanism that can be controlled remotely or autonomously. This substitution reduces the physical effort and skill required by operators while maintaining the structural strength needed for heavy loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary gross positioning manually to bring the platform close to the desired level, then the automated mechanism takes over for final precision adjustment. This preliminary action reduces the workload during installation and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If automated fine positioning mechanisms are added to improve leveling precision, then leveling accuracy increases, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform level accuracyVSAvoidoverall system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The leveling system is divided into independent gross positioning and fine positioning subsystems. The automated fine positioning mechanism operates independently after the manual gross positioning is complete, allowing the precision feature to be added without fundamentally redesigning the entire tripod structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic switching mechanism where the system transitions from manual gross positioning mode to automated fine positioning mode. This dynamic operation allows the complex automated features to be engaged only when needed, maintaining simplicity during transport and setup phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If manual gross positioning mechanisms are used, then the structure remains simple and portable, but the speed and efficiency of installation decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation speedVSAvoidpositioning mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning process is segmented into two phases: rapid manual gross positioning for quick initial setup, followed by automated fine positioning for precision leveling. This segmentation enables fast installation while incorporating automation only where it provides the most benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by seamlessly transitioning from manual to automated positioning without interruption. The automated fine positioning mechanism engages immediately after gross positioning, eliminating idle time and maximizing installation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS9163774B2Support structure with features for precision leveling
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 ORLOV EVGENY M
  • US9163774B2 patent drawing
  • US9163774B2 patent drawing
  • US9163774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support structure is provided that can comprise a central support member and leveling devices arranged in a deployed configuration where the leveling devices are radially offset from the central support member. In one embodiment of the support structure, each of the leveling devices can comprise an actuator assembly for fine positioning of a support plane of the support structure. The actuator assembly can communicate with a control system, and in one example the control system is operatively configured to monitor the position of the support plane, providing feedback in the form of a control that operates the actuator to adjust the orientation of the support plane.