Automated Locking Arrangement for Mineral Processing Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking arrangements for processing apparatuses in mineral material processing plants are time-consuming and pose safety hazards, as they rely on manual insertion of bolts, and fail to prevent movement in side and longitudinal directions during processing or movement.

Innovation Solution

A locking arrangement using actuators to support a locking element on a beam or slot, engaging in a form-fitting manner to prevent movement in multiple directions, with hydraulic, electronic, or pneumatic cylinders, and a side locking element to secure the conveyor in place.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual insertion of bolts is used to lock the processing apparatus, then the locking mechanism is simple in structure, but the operation time is excessive and safety hazards arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism structureVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical bolt insertion system with an automated actuator system. The actuator automatically positions and secures the locking element into the slot, eliminating manual intervention while maintaining structural simplicity. This substitution resolves the contradiction by automating the locking process, thereby reducing operation time without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If manual locking with bolts is used, then the device structure remains simple, but operational safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism structureVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The automated actuator system replaces manual bolt insertion, ensuring consistent and reliable locking engagement. The actuator provides controlled, precise positioning of the locking element, eliminating human error and safety hazards associated with manual operation. This maintains structural simplicity while significantly improving operational safety and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If only vertical locking is implemented, then the locking mechanism is simpler, but it fails to prevent movement in side and longitudinal directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism structureVSAvoidpositional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the locking mechanism from single-dimensional (vertical) to multi-dimensional stabilization. The locking element is designed to engage with the slot in such a way that it prevents movement not only in the vertical direction but also in lateral and longitudinal directions. This dimensional expansion of the locking function achieves complete positional stability without requiring a proportionally complex multi-component system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Loss of time

If automated actuators are used for locking, then operation time is reduced and safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking operation timeVSAvoidlocking mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator system automates the locking process, dramatically reducing operation time and eliminating manual safety hazards. While this introduces mechanical complexity, the design integrates the actuator into the existing structural framework, using the slot and locking element geometry to provide multi-directional stabilization. This integration minimizes the increase in overall device complexity while achieving the benefits of automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a safer, faster, and more robust locking mechanism that prevents conveyor movement in three directions, reducing wear and enhancing operational safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The first and/or the second actuator is a hydraulic, electronic or pneumatic cylinder.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

The first and/or the second actuator is a hydraulic, electronic or pneumatic cylinder.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic:

Implementation Method 3

The lower surface of the slots may comprise a groove configured to engage the locking bar in a form fitting manner in order to hinder longitudinal movement of the processing apparatus.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP3417148B1Locking of a processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.01.13 METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY
  • EP3417148B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3417148B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3417148B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A mineral material processing plant and a locking method and a locking arrangement for a processing apparatus, comprising a first actuator (110) configured to raise and lower the processing apparatus;a support element (120) on a side of the processing apparatus comprising slots (130); a locking element (150); a second actuator (160) configured to move the locking element (150) when actuated; wherein the locking element (150) moved by the second actuator (160) is configured to engage a slot (130) so that the processing apparatus is locked at least in one direction.