Automated Meeting Documentation System Using AI Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computer-implemented word processing and calendaring techniques fail to adequately document human in-person meetings, leading to haphazard organizational planning and unaddressed industry needs for improved methods and apparatus.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automated process configuration and information storage that guides users in managing organizational change by accessing a database of steps, retrieving information, presenting user interfaces for input, and storing user feedback to assess and implement changes, including sentiment surveys, maturity, impact, and risk assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional word processing and calendaring techniques are used, then basic meeting scheduling is possible, but adequate documentation of human in-person meetings is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeeting documentationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the meeting documentation process into distinct phases: pre-meeting preparation, during-meeting capture, and post-meeting processing. Each phase handles specific tasks (scheduling, real-time transcription, automated summarization) to ensure comprehensive documentation without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary AI assistant that bridges the gap between simple calendaring tools and comprehensive documentation requirements. This intermediary automatically transcribes, summarizes, and distributes meeting content, eliminating the need for manual documentation while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual meeting documentation methods are used, then some record-keeping is possible, but haphazard organizational planning results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganizational planningVSAvoidtime for documentation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically preparing meeting agendas, collecting relevant documents, and notifying participants before meetings occur. During and after meetings, it automatically transcribes content, generates summaries, and creates action items, eliminating the need for manual post-meeting documentation and ensuring reliable organizational planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service documentation where meetings automatically generate their own transcripts, summaries, and follow-up tasks without requiring participant intervention. This self-documenting capability ensures consistent, reliable records while freeing participants from time-consuming manual documentation efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If comprehensive meeting documentation is implemented, then better organizational planning is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation completenessVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves comprehensive documentation through a universal AI assistant that performs multiple functions: scheduling, transcription, summarization, task extraction, and distribution. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate complex systems into a single unified platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where meeting summaries and action items are automatically distributed to participants, who can then provide corrections or additions. This feedback mechanism ensures documentation completeness while maintaining system simplicity through automated iteration rather than complex manual review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240112116A1Systems and Methods for Automated Process Configuration and Information Storage
Publication Date: 2024.04.04 NETIMPACT STRATEGIES INC
  • US20240112116A1 patent drawing
  • US20240112116A1 patent drawing
  • US20240112116A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are methods and apparatus for automated process configuration and information storage. In an example, a computer-implemented method includes (i) accessing a database of information describing a plurality of steps, where the steps are ordered; (ii) retrieving, from the database, information describing a step in the plurality of steps; (iii) presenting, via a user interface, the information describing the step; (iv) requesting, via the user interface, a user input in response to the presented information; (v) receiving, from the user interface, information describing the user input; (vi) storing, in the database, the information describing the user input, where the storing includes affiliating the information describing user input and the information describing the step with a corresponding identifier; and (vii) identifying, based upon the user input, a next step in the plurality of steps. Other methods and apparatus are also disclosed.