Automated MRI Liver Volume Analysis for Hepatic Steatosis Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for liver conditions require manual selection of regions of interest, which is time-consuming and often necessitates the presence of a radiologist, limiting efficiency and accessibility in diagnosing diffuse hepatic deposition diseases like hepatic steatosis and iron overload.

Innovation Solution

The development of automated systems and methods that utilize a two-point Dixon reconstruction technique to automatically select and analyze liver volumes, allowing for the detection of liver fat and iron deposition without manual intervention, by analyzing signal intensity ratios and implementing a fully automated workflow within the MRI scanner console.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual selection of region of interest is used for MRI analysis, then diagnostic accuracy is maintained, but examination time increases and workflow efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidexamination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated selection of the volume of interest and subvolumes without requiring manual radiologist intervention. The automated workflow independently identifies liver anatomy, selects appropriate VOI, determines optimal subvolumes for analysis, and generates diagnostic recommendations, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous human operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated selection of volume of interest and subvolumes is performed during the MRI scan acquisition phase rather than after. This preliminary automated preparation ensures that when the radiologist reviews the images, the analysis is already optimized and ready, eliminating post-scan manual work and reducing total examination time while maintaining diagnostic quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual radiologist intervention is required for ROI selection, then diagnostic quality is ensured, but system complexity and operational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic qualityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated selection of the volume of interest and subvolumes without requiring manual radiologist intervention. The automated workflow independently identifies liver anatomy, selects appropriate VOI, determines optimal subvolumes for analysis, and generates diagnostic recommendations, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous human operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated workflow performs multiple functions that traditionally required radiologist expertise: anatomical identification, volume selection, subvolume determination, and diagnostic analysis. This multi-functional automation makes the system accessible to technologists and other non-specialist operators while maintaining diagnostic quality through algorithmic expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated workflow is implemented, then examination efficiency improves, but measurement precision and diagnostic accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination efficiencyVSAvoiddiagnostic accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated recommendations for the presence or absence of liver deposition disease based on quantitative analysis of the subvolumes. This feedback mechanism allows the automated workflow to make diagnostic decisions supported by objective measurements, maintaining accuracy while improving efficiency by eliminating manual measurement and interpretation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual radiologist measurements and visual assessments with automated computational analysis of MRI signal intensities and subvolume characteristics. This substitution of mechanical/manual operations with computational algorithms maintains measurement precision while dramatically improving examination efficiency and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8824766B2Systems and methods for automated magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 DUKE UNIV
  • US8824766B2 patent drawing
  • US8824766B2 patent drawing
  • US8824766B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for automated MRI. According to an aspect, a method for MRI includes receiving a plurality of MRI data signals representative of a region including a volume of interest. The method also includes determining at least one subvolume within the VOI. Further, the method includes determining a state of the at least one subvolume. The method also includes implementing a predetermined action based on the predetermined state.