Automated Order Routing System for Multi-Provider Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic commerce systems for ordering goods and services are limited by requiring predetermined preferences, reliance on operators for service allocation, potential misinterpretation of location requests, and the need for third-party intermediaries, which can lead to inefficiencies and incorrect order fulfillment.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that allows buyers to send orders automatically, verifies and translates them for multiple providers, selects the best provider based on criteria like proximity and availability, and communicates order status, eliminating the need for intermediaries and operator intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a customer contacts a single taxi company directly, then the ordering process is simple, but the customer is limited to that company's fleet and may not get the best available taxi

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider selection flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (ordering platform) that receives customer requests and automatically selects from multiple provider fleets. This mediator enables customers to access multiple providers without directly contacting each one, resolving the contradiction between provider selection flexibility and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The ordering platform serves multiple functions: receiving orders, selecting providers, translating orders to provider-specific formats, and tracking status. This multi-functional system consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems, enabling provider selection flexibility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple providers are involved, then better service allocation is possible, but the customer must know contact information for all providers and contact them individually

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider selection flexibilityVSAvoidordering process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The platform acts as a universal intermediary that abstracts away the complexity of contacting multiple providers. Customers interact with a single interface while the platform handles communications with multiple providers behind the scenes, maintaining ease of operation while enabling access to multiple providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex task of contacting multiple providers into manageable components: the customer segments their request to the platform, and the platform segments the provider selection process into automated evaluation and selection steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If an operator is used to make decisions and communicate with drivers, then service quality can be maintained, but labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment accuracyVSAvoidlabor cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the platform automatically translates orders to provider-specific formats and tracks status without human intervention. This eliminates the need for operators to manually communicate with drivers, reducing labor costs while maintaining reliability through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human operators with an automated computer-based system that performs decision-making and communication functions. This substitution maintains order fulfillment accuracy through consistent automated processes while eliminating labor costs associated with operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If GPS location is used for service allocation, then location accuracy is improved, but the system cannot handle requests for different locations or future timing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidlocation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static GPS-based location assignment to dynamic location selection where customers can specify any location and timing. The platform dynamically evaluates provider availability at the requested location and time, enabling location flexibility while maintaining accuracy through automated provider assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9990668B2System and method for intelligent ordering between a user and multiple providers
Publication Date: 2018.06.05 SAASSI LLC
  • US9990668B2 patent drawing
  • US9990668B2 patent drawing
  • US9990668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a computer system and method for facilitating a transaction between a buyer and a seller. The seller is one of multiple available providers of a product and/or service. Initially, the buyer sends out an order, and the order is automatically verified. A seller is then determined based on at least one desirable characteristic of that particular seller. Then, the order is automatically translated into a format understandable by the desired seller. The order is communicated to the desired seller and the status of the order is later communicated to the buyer.