Automated Image-Guided Patch-Clamp System for Neuronal Cultures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current patch-clamp techniques are labor-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to automate, especially when performed on neuronal cultures or brain slices, as they require manual skill and visual cues for cell recognition, limiting their application and reproducibility across labs.

Innovation Solution

An automated vision-guided patch-clamp system that uses a camera and computer processor to detect cells, control a manipulator, and manage pneumatic pressure, enabling precise and automated patch-clamp processes by transforming images into black and white, extracting contours, and identifying cells based on size and circularity, and calibrating the manipulator's position for accurate cell targeting and pressure control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual patch-clamp techniques are used, then high-quality recordings can be obtained, but the process is labor-intensive and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording qualityVSAvoiddata throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses computer vision to automatically detect and track cells, eliminating the need for continuous manual visual monitoring. The automated feedback loop continuously adjusts manipulator position based on real-time image analysis, allowing the system to self-correct and maintain recording quality without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical manipulation of the micropipette is replaced by an automated manipulator system controlled by computer vision algorithms. The system processes video feeds and translates image data into precise mechanical movements, substituting human motor skills with automated optical-mechanical integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual cell location and manipulator control are used, then visual cues can guide patching, but the process requires extensive skill and experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser skill requirementVSAvoidcell targeting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

A computer vision system acts as an intermediary between the visual field and the manipulator control. The system processes images, identifies cell boundaries and features, and translates visual information into coordinated manipulator movements, serving as a bridge that eliminates the need for human expertise in manual coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring cell position and manipulator location in real-time through video imaging. The computer vision algorithms analyze each frame, detect cell features, and dynamically adjust manipulator commands to maintain precise targeting, creating a closed-loop control system that ensures accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated systems are implemented, then productivity increases, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computer vision system serves multiple functions simultaneously: cell detection, tracking, boundary identification, and coordinate calculation. The same image processing pipeline supports both manual and automated modes, and the system can adapt to different cell types and imaging modalities, reducing overall system complexity through functional integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If pneumatic pressure control is manual, then flexibility is maintained, but reproducibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperiment reproducibilityVSAvoidpressure control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure control system transitions from static manual adjustment to dynamic automated regulation. The system continuously monitors pressure sensors and automatically adjusts pneumatic pressure in real-time based on feedback, enabling precise control of suction and release phases while ensuring reproducibility across experiments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10324080B2Systems and methods for automated image-guided patch-clamp electrophysiology in vitro
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 PURDUE RES FOUND
  • US10324080B2 patent drawing
  • US10324080B2 patent drawing
  • US10324080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated, image-guided systems for automatically performing in vitro cell patch clamping are provided. The systems are configured for use with a patch-clamp arrangement and include a camera system for providing images from tissues under investigation and a computer to execute calibration, detection, and whole-cell patching algorithms based on the collected image data. Automated methods for carrying out in vitro cell patch clamping using this automated, image-guided system are also provided and include using images to automatically calibrate a manipulator relative to a tissue of interest, detect and extract coordinates for a plurality of cells, and utilizing the coordinates with a patch-clamp arrangement to automatically move a manipulator directly above each of the plurality of cells and initiate the performance of an automated patch clamp mechanism for each of the plurality of cells driven by the system.