Automated pattern generation processes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing carpet tile patterning technologies face challenges in creating non-repeating patterns that minimize seam discontinuities and patterning artifacts, while maintaining a unified visual theme and preserving pile orientation, which are often disrupted by the need to rotate tiles during installation.

Innovation Solution

An automated system generates composite patterns for carpet tiles using separately configurable pattern layers, with a base layer providing unique patterns and an overlay layer incorporating common design elements to unify the installation, allowing for random or pseudo-random appearances without requiring tile rotation, thus masking manufacturing artifacts and seam discontinuities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a repeating pattern is used on carpet tiles, then manufacturing and installation are simplified, but seam discontinuities and patterning artifacts become visually obtrusive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern consistencyVSAvoidseam discontinuity visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pattern is segmented into multiple independent layers (base layer, overlay layers) that can be independently configured and combined. This allows each layer to contribute differently to the overall pattern, creating complexity that masks seam discontinuities while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through modular layer management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically generates unique pattern combinations for each tile by randomly selecting and superimposing layers. This creates visual variety across the installation that draws attention away from seams, while the underlying layer structure maintains manufacturing simplicity through standardized layer templates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If tile rotation is used during installation to achieve random pattern appearance, then pattern uniformity is improved, but pile orientation is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern uniformityVSAvoidpile orientation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of achieving pattern variety through physical tile rotation (spatial arrangement), the invention creates variety through digital layer superposition (dimensional composition). Multiple pattern layers are superimposed in the digital domain to generate unique combinations for each tile, eliminating the need for physical rotation while maintaining visual interest and uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple pattern layers are superimposed to create unique patterns, then visual variety and seam masking are improved, but pattern generation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning artifact visibilityVSAvoidpattern generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pattern generation system is segmented into independent, pre-configured layer templates that can be stored and reused. Each layer represents a discrete design element that can be independently managed, making the complex multi-layer system easier to control and modify compared to generating entire patterns as single complex units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Stability of the object's composition

If common design elements are included across all tiles, then visual unity of the installation is improved, but pattern uniqueness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation visual unityVSAvoidpattern variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges common design elements (unifying layers) with unique random variations (variable layers) in a superimposed composite pattern. The common elements provide visual unity across the installation, while the randomly selected and configured layers ensure each tile maintains uniqueness, resolving the contradiction between unity and variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2011084B1Automated pattern generation processes
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 MILLIKEN & CO
  • EP2011084B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2011084B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2011084B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This disclosure relates to an automated system for generating large numbers of digitally-defined patterns suitable for printing on textiles wherein each pattern is individually different but shares one or more unifying design motifs with all other patterns. In the general case, each pattern is comprised of at least two components in the form of separately configurable pattern layers that are digitally superimposed to form a composite pattern that is unique but visually related to all other unique patterns that use pattern layers taken from the same pattern sources.