Automated Performance Testing Framework for Dynamic Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional performance testing methods are inadequate for dynamic production environments, failing to accurately predict performance in real-time use scenarios due to static test conditions, increased database sizes, and integration challenges, leading to inefficiencies and high costs.

Innovation Solution

A scalable and pluggable framework for automated performance testing that monitors workload, response times, and resource utilization, extrapolates results from static to dynamic environments, and integrates with load generators and profilers to provide end-to-end visibility and predictive analytics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional performance testing methods are used with static test environments, then testing simplicity is maintained, but accuracy of performance prediction in dynamic production environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance prediction accuracyVSAvoidtest environment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static test environments into dynamic ones by introducing runtime adaptation mechanisms. The system continuously monitors production environment characteristics and dynamically adjusts test parameters, workload patterns, and resource allocation to match real-world conditions, thereby improving performance prediction accuracy without requiring overly complex manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The performance testing system automatically adapts to production environments by self-configuring test parameters based on monitored system state. The system performs autonomous workload characterization, resource utilization analysis, and test scenario generation without requiring extensive manual intervention, thus improving accuracy while keeping operational complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If database size is increased to match production environment, then realism of test results is improved, but resource consumption and testing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest result realismVSAvoiddatabase size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring full-scale production database copies for testing, the patent employs database emulation techniques that replicate essential production characteristics, data relationships, and access patterns using significantly reduced data volumes. This allows realistic performance testing while minimizing resource consumption and storage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses database size extrapolation methods where tests are performed on smaller database instances, and results are mathematically adjusted to predict performance at production scale. This approach maintains test realism while avoiding the exponential resource costs of testing with full production-sized databases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If performance testing is performed in static environments, then test setup simplicity is maintained, but ability to detect latent defects in dynamic conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic test scenario generation that adapts to monitored production workloads and system states. Test cases are automatically adjusted to reflect real-time conditions including variable user behavior patterns, resource contention scenarios, and failure modes that only manifest in dynamic environments, thereby improving defect detection without requiring overly complex manual test design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors production environment behavior and uses this feedback to refine and adapt performance tests. By analyzing actual runtime characteristics and feeding this information back into test generation, the system automatically identifies and targets latent defects that would remain undetected in static testing, while maintaining manageable complexity through automated feedback loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8756586B2System and method for automated performance testing in a dynamic production environment
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US8756586B2 patent drawing
  • US8756586B2 patent drawing
  • US8756586B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system and method for automated performance testing in a dynamic production environment. More particularly the present invention relates to an automated system that enables the determination of whether a software application can meet the scalability and performance requirements in a real time use environment, wherein the performance requirement test comprises test for workload, reliability and resource usage. The system of the present invention provides an automated system for performing testing method that can convert a static environment i.e. fixed workload, one application state and one hardware representation into a dynamic one and predict accurate performance results for said constantly changing application. The system enables less effort, time and consequently money, and meets the performance scalability and requirements in real-time.