Automated Pest Trap with Sensor-Driven Remote Resetting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pest control traps require manual inspection and resetting, leading to inefficiencies and additional work time and expense due to untimely triggers and the need for operator intervention.

Innovation Solution

A remotely armed and automatically resettable trap equipped with sensors and a motor to detect trap activation and pest capture, utilizing a telecommunications module for remote status monitoring and resetting, and energy-efficient batteries for autonomous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection and resetting of traps is used, then trap functionality is maintained, but work time and expense increase due to regular operator travel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrap functionalityVSAvoidoperator travel time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The trap system performs self-inspection through sensors that automatically detect trap activation and pest capture status. The system self-resets by using a motor to return the capture structure to its initial position, eliminating the need for operator intervention and reducing travel time while maintaining reliable trap functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical resetting process is replaced with an automated motor-driven mechanism. The motor receives signals from sensors and automatically actuates the capture structure back to its initial position, substituting human labor with an automated electromechanical system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual trap resetting is required, then trap readiness is ensured, but productivity decreases due to regular inspection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrap readinessVSAvoidpest control efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors provide continuous feedback on trap status (activation and pest capture detection) to a control unit, which automatically controls the motor to reset the trap when needed. This closed-loop feedback system ensures trap readiness without requiring manual inspection, thereby maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors its own status through sensors and performs self-resetting operations, eliminating the need for external operator intervention. This self-service capability maintains trap readiness while improving productivity by removing the bottleneck of manual inspection and resetting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If sensors and motor are added for automatic resetting, then manual intervention is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual interventionVSAvoidsensor and motor components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it processes sensor signals, determines trap status, controls the motor actuator, and manages communication with external systems. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional control unit, the system reduces overall complexity despite adding sensors and motor components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit merges the control functions for the motor actuator and the sensor signal processing into a single integrated component. This consolidation reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall system architecture, making the added complexity of sensors and motor more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables automatic and remote trap arming and resetting, reducing manual intervention and operational costs while maintaining trap functionality.

Implementation Method 1

a spring arranged to cause the capture structure to rotate around an axis when it is released

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a motor arranged to actuate means for re-arming the trap if no pest is detected in the triggered trap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric motor: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP4297570B1Automatically and remotely armed pest trap
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 FROJMOVICS ABRAHAM
  • EP4297570B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4297570B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4297570B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a trap for animal pest that can be set automatically and remotely. More particularly, the invention relates to a pest trap comprising a supporting platform (1) supporting a trapping structure (5), a hook (3) designed to hold the trapping structure in the "set" position, a lever (2) designed to move the hook to so as to release the trapping structure when pressure is applied to said lever, a spring (4) designed to cause the trapping structure to rotate about an axis when released, characterized in that the trap further comprises a sensor (6) that detects whether the trap is set or has been sprung, a sensor (7) that detects the trapping of a pest if the trap is sprung, and a motor (9) designed to actuate means for resetting the trap if no pest is detected in the trap which has been sprung.