Automated Plant Control With Redundant Multivariable Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial plant operations, particularly nuclear power plants, require continuous human operator intervention for desired operations and lack a facility-wide automated controller to coordinate component-level data and automate facility-wide changes, leading to potential unproductive or dangerous conditions.

Innovation Solution

An automated instrumentation and control system featuring multivariable controllers that interface with plant sensors and actuators, perform calculations based on physics models, and issue control commands without human intervention, ensuring redundancy and reliability even in the event of component failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human operators continuously monitor and control plant operations, then operational safety and responsiveness are maintained, but operator workload and potential for human error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-diagnosis and self-correction by automatically detecting component failures, voting on redundant signals, and executing predetermined control sequences without operator intervention. The system monitors its own state and takes corrective actions, freeing operators from continuous monitoring while maintaining safety through automated reliability mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives feedback from sensors monitoring plant parameters and component status, processes this information through redundant controllers, and automatically adjusts operations based on the feedback. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to maintain safe operations autonomously by responding to changing conditions without operator input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated control systems are implemented to reduce human intervention, then operational efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent modular controllers that each manage specific functions. Each controller operates independently with its own sensors and actuators, allowing the system to achieve automation through coordinated modular units rather than a single complex system. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The redundant controllers are designed with universal functionality to perform multiple control functions through software configuration rather than dedicated hardware for each function. This multi-functionality allows the same physical controllers to handle various plant operations, reducing hardware complexity while enabling comprehensive automated control across different operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If redundant controllers are used to ensure continued operation during failures, then system reliability improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinued operation capabilityVSAvoidcontroller configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses identical copies of the same controller hardware and software logic arranged in a redundant configuration. Each controller is a duplicate capable of independent operation, and the redundancy is achieved through configuration rather than specialized components. This copying approach ensures continued operation during failures while minimizing the complexity increase compared to using different or specialized redundant components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves redundancy through changes in the operational parameters and configuration states of the controllers rather than through additional specialized hardware. By configuring controllers to operate in redundant modes and using voting logic to select between controller outputs, the system achieves high reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250226125A1Systems and methods for automated plant control
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 GE HITACHI NUCLEAR ENERGY AMERICAS LLC
  • US20250226125A1 patent drawing
  • US20250226125A1 patent drawing
  • US20250226125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods provide data gathering and execution on the same without human operations. Systems may include controls and sensors that electronically provide data and operations to a processor networked with the same. For a nuclear reactor, the processor may determine reactivity from the sensors and issue commands to actuators to operate the reactor. Reactivity may be determined based on all reactivity factors determined from the plant data, including the use of modelling. The processor may position control elements or moderator feeds to achieve a desired reactivity. The processor may be networked to plant switches and sensors, and multiple processors may be used to independently calculate and decide on plant operations. Human operator input is not required at discreet instances of plant operational change; systems may include displays and input interfaces to permit observation and/or intervention if absolutely necessary.