Automated Employee Ranking System Using Combinatorial Algorithms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional employee ranking systems are manual, time-consuming, and lack the necessary granularity and accuracy, especially in large organizations where high-level managers struggle to assign individual ranks due to exponential complexities and lack of knowledge about employees at lower hierarchical levels.

Innovation Solution

An automated ranking system that uses a software-based tool to analyze performance scoring data from multiple hierarchical levels, applying weightings and combinatorial formulas to generate a single, objective ranking score for each employee, allowing for more granular and accurate comparisons across the organization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual ranking is used by high-level managers, then employee performance can be assessed, but the process becomes exponentially complex and time-consuming with large employee populations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveranking accuracyVSAvoidranking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computational ranking system that acts as an intermediary between performance data collection and final ranking decisions. The system automatically processes performance scores through combinatorial algorithms to generate rankings, eliminating the need for manual ranking by high-level managers while preserving ranking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual ranking process with an automated computational system. Instead of managers manually assigning ranks to hundreds or thousands of employees, the system uses algorithms to automatically calculate rankings based on performance scores, dramatically reducing the time required while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual ranking is used to ensure accurate employee assessment, then performance evaluation can be performed, but the complexity increases exponentially with organizational size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidranking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex combinatorial ranking calculations from the manual decision-making process and embeds them within an automated computational system. This allows the system to handle the mathematical complexity of ranking hundreds or thousands of employees without burdening human managers, while maintaining evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The ranking system performs self-service by automatically calculating rankings based on input performance data without requiring manual intervention. The system handles the complex computations internally through combinatorial algorithms, eliminating the need for human managers to engage in time-consuming manual ranking processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If generic rating categories are used, then employee performance can be assessed easily, but the granularity is insufficient for detailed comparisons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverating application easeVSAvoidrating granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the performance assessment into two distinct components: simple generic rating categories for ease of application, and automated combinatorial ranking calculations for precise granular comparisons. This segmentation allows managers to easily assign performance scores while the system automatically generates detailed granular rankings for comparison purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9147177B2Method and system for implementing a scoring mechanism
Publication Date: 2015.09.29 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9147177B2 patent drawing
  • US9147177B2 patent drawing
  • US9147177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is an improved method, system, and computer program product for implementing an improved method and system for generating performance scores for employees. Also disclosed is an approach for ranking employees which avoids the complexity and excessive resources often needed to implement employee rankings.