Automated Residual Seal Force Testing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for residual seal force (RSF) and compression friction (CF) testing in parenteral containers are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and lack automation, making them inefficient for quality control processes.

Innovation Solution

A system, method, and apparatus for automating RSF and CF testing using a load frame with a load cell, a rotating platen assembly, and a controller to position specimens and apply compressive forces, enabling rapid and accurate measurement of seal forces and friction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual testing methods are used for residual seal force and compression friction testing, then the testing process is simple to operate, but the testing speed is slow and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is divided into separate functional modules: a load frame for applying compressive force, a load cell for measuring force, a rotating platen assembly for positioning and testing, and a controller for automation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to achieve automated high-speed testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical testing process is replaced with an automated system where the load frame mechanically applies controlled compressive forces, the load cell electronically measures the residual seal force, and the controller automates the testing sequence. This substitution of manual operation with automated mechanical and electronic systems increases testing speed and reduces labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If automated testing systems are implemented, then testing speed and accuracy improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load cell provides real-time feedback on the compressive force applied during testing, allowing the controller to monitor and verify measurement accuracy. The system uses this feedback to ensure precise measurement of residual seal force while maintaining control over the testing process, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring excessive system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating platen assembly serves multiple functions: it positions the specimen, applies the compressive load, and facilitates the testing motion. The load frame simultaneously provides structural support and delivers the testing force. By designing components to perform multiple functions, the system achieves high measurement precision while minimizing the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The automated system significantly increases testing speed and accuracy, allowing for higher volumes of product to be tested efficiently, thereby enhancing quality control processes in parenteral container manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

a load frame with a load cell, a rotating platen assembly, and a controller to position specimens and apply compressive forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

apply compressive forces, enabling rapid and accurate measurement of seal forces and friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

compression friction measurement testing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20250180589A1System, Method, and Apparatus for Automating Specimen Testing
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20250180589A1 patent drawing
  • US20250180589A1 patent drawing
  • US20250180589A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a testing system for performing specimen testing, such as residual seal force (RSF) testing and/or compression friction (CF) measurement testing. The testing system comprising a column supported by a base structure, a load cell supported by said column, a specimen plate configured to receive a plurality of specimens, a motor, and controller. The load cell is configured to move along the column toward and away from the base structure via a crosshead coupled to an actuator. The plurality of specimens comprising a first specimen and a second specimen. The controller is configured to control the motor to adjust a position of said specimen plate.