Automated Scheduling System Reducing Negotiation Cycles
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional methods for scheduling meetings and events are inefficient, requiring repetitive cycles of negotiation and significant user interaction to coordinate schedules across different time zones and locations, often necessitating multiple interactions and the use of various applications for conflict resolution.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method and system that automates the scheduling process by receiving communication from an organizer, processing information, accessing attendee scheduling preferences, generating options, and scheduling meetings or events based on selected preferences, utilizing email or messaging as an interface to facilitate dialogue among attendees.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If conventional scheduling methods are used with multiple rounds of negotiation, then meeting schedules can be coordinated across different time zones and locations, but the scheduling process becomes time-consuming and inefficient
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by automatically checking attendee availability, analyzing scheduling constraints, and generating optimized meeting time options before the actual scheduling decision is made. This eliminates the need for multiple back-and-forth negotiation rounds while ensuring reliable coordination across time zones and locations.
Solution Approach 2:
The scheduling system acts as an intermediary that automatically processes scheduling requests, evaluates multiple constraints (time zones, availability, preferences), and presents optimized options to users. This mediator function replaces manual negotiation while maintaining accurate schedule coordination.
2Adaptability or versatility
If dedicated scheduling applications are used to coordinate meetings, then scheduling options and conflicts can be managed, but user interaction complexity and the number of required applications increase
Solution Approach 1:
The scheduling system provides multi-functional capabilities within a single platform, handling availability checking, conflict detection, option generation, and scheduling confirmation. This universal approach eliminates the need for multiple dedicated applications while maintaining comprehensive scheduling management.
Solution Approach 2:
The system merges scheduling management, communication, and coordination functions into a unified process. By combining these previously separate functions into one integrated system, it reduces the number of applications users need to interact with while maintaining full scheduling versatility.
3Measurement precision
If manual scheduling processes are used to accommodate attendee preferences and constraints, then scheduling accuracy can be maintained, but the number of user interactions and negotiations required increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables self-service scheduling by automatically analyzing attendee preferences and constraints, generating optimized meeting time options, and presenting them for selection. This reduces user interaction effort while maintaining scheduling precision through automated preference analysis.
Solution Approach 2:
The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that automatically consider attendee responses, availability updates, and preference changes to refine scheduling options. This feedback loop maintains high scheduling accuracy while minimizing the need for repeated manual negotiations.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems and methods for scheduling a meeting or event in a manner that is more efficient than conventional systems or dedicated applications, and can be configured to take into account sources of information available on a common platform or available within a common account (such as calendars, locations, preferences, etc.).