Automated Security Assessment Framework for Business-Critical Applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security assessment solutions for business-critical applications, such as ERP and CRM systems, fail to adequately address the security risks in the technological components of these systems, leading to vulnerabilities that can result in sabotage, espionage, and fraud.

Innovation Solution

A new application security assessment framework that enables automated security and compliance audits, detects technical security vulnerabilities, and illustrates associated security risks across business-critical applications, utilizing a core engine, scan engine, and specialized modules to remotely assess technological components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing security assessment solutions focus only on functional layer and base layer, then functional security checks are performed, but technological component security risks are overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional securityVSAvoidtechnological component vulnerabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the security assessment into three distinct layers: functional layer (authorization checks), base layer (OS and database vulnerabilities), and technological component layer (runtime platform, protocols, and architecture). This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage of all security aspects, including the previously overlooked technological components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to security assessment by introducing the technological component layer, which evaluates runtime platforms, communication protocols, and system architecture. This dimensional expansion transforms the assessment from traditional two-layer to three-layer model, capturing previously invisible security risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If manual security assessment is performed, then detailed security review is possible, but cost and time requirements become prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity assessment detailVSAvoidassessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated self-assessment capabilities where the security assessment system automatically discovers, evaluates, and reports security vulnerabilities without requiring manual intervention. The system performs self-service security auditing by automatically testing functional layers, base layers, and technological components, significantly reducing cost and time while maintaining detailed assessment quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical security assessment processes with automated computational systems. The automated assessment engine substitutes human analysts with algorithm-driven testing, vulnerability scanning, and security evaluation, achieving both high precision and improved productivity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive security assessment of technological components is performed, then security risks are identified, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall securityVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages complexity by segmenting the assessment system into specialized modules: functional layer assessment module, base layer assessment module, and technological component assessment module. Each module focuses on specific aspects, making the overall complex system manageable through clear separation of concerns and specialized functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If traditional security audits are conducted, then functional security is verified, but audit costs remain high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity complianceVSAvoidaudit cost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables organizations to perform self-service security audits using the automated assessment system, eliminating or reducing the need for expensive external security consultants. The system automatically conducts comprehensive audits across all three layers, providing cost-efficient security verification while maintaining high compliance standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12271481B2Automated security assessment of business-critical systems and applications
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 ONAPSIS SRL
  • US12271481B2 patent drawing
  • US12271481B2 patent drawing
  • US12271481B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods which provide a new application security assessment framework that allows auditing and testing systems to automatically perform security and compliance audits, detect technical security vulnerabilities, and illustrate the associated security risks affecting business-critical applications.