Automated Security Validation System for PCI Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The payment cards industry faces challenges in efficiently validating compliance with data security standards like PCI DSS, particularly due to the length and burden of self-assessment questionnaires (SAQs) and the loss of security implementation data when merchants switch acquirers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automated validation of proprietary security implementations, which involves receiving lists of security service providers from merchants, enabling connections with these providers, collecting security service information, generating security service profiles, and outputting these profiles to an electronic storage medium for efficient compliance reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If merchants complete self-assessment questionnaires (SAQs) to validate PCI compliance, then compliance validation is achieved, but the process becomes lengthy and burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance validationVSAvoidtime to complete SAQ
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-validation where the compliance validation system automatically queries security service providers and generates compliance reports without requiring manual completion of SAQs by merchants. The system serves itself by automatically gathering security information, validating against PCI DSS requirements, and generating compliance documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of completing SAQs by merchants is replaced with an automated electronic system that queries security service providers, validates compliance automatically, and generates reports. The mechanical action of manually answering questionnaire items is substituted with automated data retrieval and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If merchants use multiple security service providers to meet PCI requirements, then comprehensive security coverage is improved, but the complexity of tracking and validating compliance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidcompliance tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance validation system serves multiple functions: it queries multiple security service providers, aggregates their security information, validates against PCI DSS requirements, and generates comprehensive compliance reports. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise be separate manual tracking processes into a single system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges information from multiple security service providers into a unified compliance profile for each merchant. By combining data from various providers and consolidating validation processes, the system reduces the complexity of tracking compliance across multiple services while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If merchants switch acquirers, then business flexibility is improved, but security implementation data is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquirer switching flexibilityVSAvoidsecurity implementation data
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously querying and storing security implementation data from security service providers before a merchant switches acquirers. This ensures that when a merchant changes acquirers, the security data is already preserved and can be immediately transferred to the new acquirer without loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback loops where security service providers continuously update their systems with security implementation data, which is then fed back to the compliance validation system. This continuous feedback mechanism ensures data is always current and available regardless of acquirer changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250182112A1Systems and methods for automated validation for proprietary security implementations
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 WORLDPAY LLC
  • US20250182112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250182112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250182112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for automated validation for proprietary security implementations. One method includes: receiving, from each of a plurality of merchants, a list of security service providers used by the merchant; enabling connection with the each of the security service providers of the received list of security service providers used by the merchant; receiving, from each of the listed security service provider with connection enabled, security service information as it pertains to the merchant of the plurality of merchants; generating a security service profile for each merchant of the plurality of merchants, based on the received security service information from each security service provider of the received list of security service providers of the merchant; and outputting the security service profile of the merchant of the plurality of merchants to an electronic storage medium.