Automated Shade Control with Graduated Shading Algorithms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated shade control systems are limited in effectively managing solar load and interior light levels, as they do not consider graduated shading and brightness variations, leading to inefficient energy use and discomfort due to excessive heat gain and glare.

Innovation Solution

An automated shade control system that incorporates proactive and reactive algorithms, using shadow and reflectance information to control window coverings, optimizing daylighting and reducing solar heat gain through motorized window coverings with real-time adjustments based on solar radiation, brightness, and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If photo sensors and temperature sensors are used to control window coverings, then automation capability is improved, but the system cannot effectively manage graduated shading and brightness variations within the interior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidgraduated shading control
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The window covering is divided into multiple independently controllable segments or zones, allowing different shading levels across different areas. This enables graduated shading where each segment can be positioned independently to create brightness gradients throughout the interior space, resolving the limitation of uniform shading in traditional automated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different zones of the window covering are assigned different control characteristics and shading parameters based on local requirements. Each zone can have customized brightness targets, response thresholds, and positioning algorithms, allowing the system to provide localized brightness control and graduated shading effects rather than applying a single uniform control strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If clear or high visible light transmitting glazing is used to maximize natural daylight, then energy efficiency is improved, but solar heat gain and glare increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsolar heat gain and glare
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The window covering system dynamically adjusts its position and opacity in real-time based on changing solar conditions, interior brightness levels, and thermal requirements. The system transitions between fully transparent, partially shaded, and fully opaque states, optimizing the balance between daylight transmission and solar heat gain reduction throughout the day and across different weather conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously including shade position, opacity level, and control thresholds based on environmental conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system maximizes daylight utilization while minimizing solar heat gain and glare, resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and harmful solar effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensor types and control criteria are employed to define shading parameters, then control precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshading parameter precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single integrated control system performs multiple functions by processing data from various sensor types (photo sensors, temperature sensors, brightness sensors) and applying multiple control criteria simultaneously. The system universally handles daylighting optimization, thermal comfort control, glare prevention, and energy management through a unified algorithmic framework, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-loop feedback control where sensor measurements continuously inform adjustments to window covering positions. Brightness sensors provide feedback on interior light levels, temperature sensors feedback on thermal conditions, and the control system adjusts shading parameters in response to these feedback signals, achieving precise control through continuous adaptation rather than complex open-loop configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8125172B2Automated shade control method and system
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 MECHOSHADE SYSTEMS LLC
  • US8125172B2 patent drawing
  • US8125172B2 patent drawing
  • US8125172B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention generally relates to automated shade systems. An automated shade system comprises one or more motorized window coverings, sensors, and controllers that use one or more algorithms to control operation of the automated shade control system. These algorithms may include information such as: 3-D models of a building and surrounding structures; shadow information; reflectance information; lighting and radiation information; ASHRAE clear sky algorithms; log information related to manual overrides; occupant preference information; motion information; real-time sky conditions; solar radiation on a building; a total foot-candle load on a structure; brightness overrides; actual and/or calculated BTU load; time-of-year information; and microclimate analysis.