Automated Specimen Routing System for Pathology Labs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anatomic pathology and molecular diagnostic laboratory automation systems are inefficient in handling specimens that require individual prioritization and rapid processing, as they rely on manual sorting and conveyor systems, which can lead to delays and inadequate tracking of specimens and reporting of results.

Innovation Solution

A method that automates the assignment of individual specimens to specific workstations within a laboratory, using a computerized system to prioritize specimens, determine optimal routing, and track their location, allowing for independent transportation and reporting of results to a central database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual sorting and conveyor systems are used to group specimens, then cost efficiency is improved, but turnaround time and ability to handle prioritized specimens deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidturnaround time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service automation where robotic devices automatically sort, transport, and track specimens without manual intervention. The automation system independently manages specimen routing based on priority levels and testing requirements, eliminating the need for manual sorting while maintaining cost efficiency through reduced labor requirements and improved throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic routing where specimen carriers are automatically directed to different workstations based on real-time priority levels and testing requirements. The automation adapts routing decisions dynamically rather than using fixed conveyor paths, allowing stat specimens to be rapidly redirected to appropriate workstations while maintaining efficient flow for routine specimens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If separate automated processing devices connected by conveyors are used, then automation extent is improved, but adaptability to varying specimen requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation extentVSAvoidadaptability to varying specimen requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal robotic carriers that can transport multiple specimen types to various workstations. The same automated robotic system handles different specimen priorities and routing requirements, providing multi-functionality that replaces dedicated conveyor systems for each specimen type while maintaining high automation extent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automation system dynamically adjusts routing and processing based on specimen priority levels and testing requirements. Rather than fixed conveyor paths, the system uses programmable robotic navigation to adapt specimen routes in real-time, allowing the same automated infrastructure to serve multiple specimen types and priority levels effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual movement of specimens is used for prioritized processing, then adaptability to specimen priority is improved, but productivity and efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to specimen priorityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies and routes prioritized specimens without manual intervention. The automation system independently monitors specimen priority levels and directs carriers to appropriate workstations, maintaining adaptability to varying specimen requirements while eliminating the productivity limitations of manual specimen movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses tracking and communication systems to monitor specimen locations and priority levels in real-time. This feedback enables the automation system to dynamically adjust routing decisions, ensuring prioritized specimens receive appropriate attention while maintaining overall system productivity through coordinated automated resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of manufacture

If grouping of specimens in single carriers is used, then cost efficiency is improved, but ability to handle individual specimen priorities deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidability to handle individual specimen priorities
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments specimen carriers into individual units that can be independently routed and tracked. Rather than grouping multiple specimens in a single carrier that must follow the same path, each specimen carrier is independently managed, allowing cost-efficient automation while maintaining the ability to handle individual specimen priorities through separate routing decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8822224B2Method for automatic testing of anatomical laboratory specimens
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 PRAIRIE VENTURES
  • US8822224B2 patent drawing
  • US8822224B2 patent drawing
  • US8822224B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatic evaluation, processing and/or testing of an anatomic pathology specimen is disclosed. The specimen is placed into a primary or secondary container labeled with a unique identification code, placed into a specimen carrier, and the carrier marked with an identification code which uniquely identifies the specimen and, by virtue of the identification code, the evaluation, processing and/or tests to be conducted thereon. The identification code may be in the form of a bar code, an RFID tag or similar device or any other identification that is either human read able, machine readable or electronically transferred. The specimen contained within the specimen container or within the specimen carrier is entered into the anatomic pathology, histology or molecular diagnostics LAS at a receiving station, which reads the identification code.