Automated Spinal Stenosis Analysis via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current imaging technologies for spinal analysis, such as X-ray and MRI, lack autonomous and objective analysis methods, leading to subjective interpretations and difficulties in reliably detecting spinal conditions and deformities, especially in tracking patient progress and predicting outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing anatomical image data using machine learning models, specifically selecting regions of interest in 3D image data to identify spinal cord, thecal sac, nerve roots, and intervertebral discs, determining parameters and severity of spinal stenosis and disc degeneration, and providing consistent and accurate interpretations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional imaging methods (X-ray, MRI) are used for spinal analysis, then imaging capability is provided, but autonomous and objective analysis is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous analysisVSAvoidobjectivity of detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual physician analysis with an automated machine learning-based system. The machine learning model processes imaging data (X-ray, MRI, CT) to automatically detect spinal conditions, measure parameters, and generate reports, eliminating subjective human interpretation while maintaining high reliability through trained algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing imaging data without requiring physician intervention for each measurement. The machine learning model independently processes images, identifies spinal structures, measures parameters such as disc height and canal dimensions, and generates diagnostic reports autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual analysis by physicians is performed, then expert interpretation is achieved, but time consumption and subjectivity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis speedVSAvoidtime for measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system operates continuously and rapidly processes imaging data without interruption. The automated pipeline continuously extracts features, measures parameters, and generates reports in real-time, eliminating the variable time consumption associated with manual physician analysis and enabling rapid sequential processing of multiple cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If subjective analysis methods are used, then flexibility in interpretation is maintained, but consistency and reproducibility decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement consistencyVSAvoidinterpretation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms subjective visual interpretation into objective quantitative parameters. The machine learning model measures specific parameters such as disc height, canal dimensions, and spinal curvature with precise numerical values, ensuring consistent and reproducible results across different analyses while maintaining the ability to interpret complex spinal anatomy through standardized metric evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240312032A1Systems, devices, and methods for generating data series to visualize quantitative structure data registered to imaging data
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 AUGMEDICS INC
  • US20240312032A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312032A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312032A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include example systems, methods, and computer-accessible mediums for analysis and visualization of data associated with anatomical images. In some embodiments the anatomical images can be spinal images used for assessment of stenosis and disc degeneration. In some embodiments, systems, devices, and methods described herein include selecting a region of interest (ROI) in a three-dimensional (3D) volume of image data of a plurality of vertebra of a spine, identifying one or more anatomical parts in the ROI, determining one or more parameters of the one or more anatomical parts, and assessing a severity of a spinal deformity based on the one or more parameters.