Automated Stereolithography Printer with Segmented Stations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional 3D printing methods using stereolithography require significant manual intervention, leading to labor-intensive processes, longer processing times, and variability in producing 3D objects with liquid photopolymers, especially when using visual display screens as light encoding devices.

Innovation Solution

A stereolithographic 3D printer system with automated stations for exposure, wash, post-exposure, and load/unload processes, where build platforms move between stations to perform these functions simultaneously, utilizing a visual display screen for selective polymerization and a washing solution for resin removal, with independent z-axis motion for precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual intervention is used for each stage of the 3D printing process (exposure, washing, post-exposure), then flexibility and control are maintained, but labor requirements increase and processing time extends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control flexibilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The printing system is divided into multiple independent stations (exposure station, wash station, post-exposure station, load/unload station), each performing a specific function. Build platforms move between these stations sequentially, allowing different operations to occur simultaneously at different stations, thereby automating the process while maintaining operational control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic motion control where build platforms are moved between stations along a conveyor path, and stations can independently adjust their operations. The z-axis motion is decoupled and controlled independently, enabling flexible positioning and simultaneous operations across multiple stations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If manual processing is used for washing and post-exposure stages, then process variability can be managed, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess consistencyVSAvoidtotal processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous processing by having multiple build platforms cycle through different stations simultaneously. While one platform undergoes exposure, another is being washed, and a third is undergoing post-exposure, eliminating idle time between operations and maintaining continuous productive action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The wash station performs preliminary cleaning of uncured resin immediately after exposure, and the post-exposure station completes the polymerization process beforehand before final unloading. This sequencing ensures that each subsequent operation builds on the previous one without interruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If a single station performs all 3D printing operations sequentially, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to sequential processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidoutput per unit time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into multiple specialized stations, each dedicated to a specific operation (exposure, washing, post-exposure, loading/unloading). This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple build platforms simultaneously, increasing overall productivity while keeping each individual station relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple build platforms share the same conveyor path and are subjected to the same sequence of operations, but at different times. The system structure serves multiple functions: it can process multiple platforms simultaneously through different stations, and each station can handle different stages of the printing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This automation significantly reduces labor requirements, increases production efficiency, and minimizes variability by decoupling motion tasks, allowing each process to operate independently and concurrently, thereby optimizing the 3D printing process.

Implementation Method 1

the printer builds 3D objects from successive layers of selectively polymerised liquid photosensitive polymer (resin), also referred to as photopolymer. The liquid photopolymer is polymerised (hardened) by electromagnetic radiation exposure of an appropriate wavelength

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

the resin attached to the surface of the object being allowed to drain back into the vat, the print platform to which the object has been built upon is then typically removed from the printer by hand and transferred to a wash station where it is washed with a solvent solution to remove any remaining liquid resin attached to the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS11097467B2Method of automating the manufacture of 3D printed objects
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 PHOTOCENTRIC
  • US11097467B2 patent drawing
  • US11097467B2 patent drawing
  • US11097467B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stereolithographic 3D printer comprising a number of functional stations that are connected in an automated process so that they can perform the following functions simultaneously; a) the selective exposure of liquid photopolymer, b) the washing off of excess photopolymer, c) the post exposure of the built part (optionally under water) and optionally d) the load and unloading of the part.