Automated Surveillance System with Real-Time Object State Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional surveillance systems require manual analysis, are prone to inaccuracies and delays, and lack the ability to automatically respond to events in real-time, such as detecting weapons or violence, and fail to trigger immediate actions in surveillance areas.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a server arrangement connected to sensors in a surveillance area that acquires data, analyzes it to determine objects of interest, estimates their state, compares it to trigger conditions, and triggers appropriate actions through an external application when conditions are met, enabling real-time responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual analysis of surveillance data is used, then system complexity is reduced, but detection accuracy and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with automated electronic image processing systems. The server arrangement automatically processes surveillance images, detects objects of interest, and triggers actions without human intervention, thereby improving detection accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The surveillance system performs self-analysis through automated image processing algorithms. The server arrangement independently evaluates surveillance data, identifies objects of interest, determines their states, and triggers appropriate actions, eliminating the need for manual analysis and significantly improving response time and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If manual analysis of surveillance data is used, then system cost is reduced, but response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual analysis with automated electronic processing. The server arrangement continuously processes surveillance images in real-time, immediately detecting objects of interest and triggering actions without human intervention, thereby dramatically reducing response time while keeping costs manageable through software automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The surveillance system operates continuously without interruption. The server arrangement processes surveillance data in real-time continuously, ensuring that objects of interest are detected and actions are triggered immediately upon occurrence, eliminating the delays inherent in manual batch processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Device complexity

If conventional surveillance systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but automation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidautomation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The surveillance system achieves full automation through self-service capabilities. The server arrangement automatically processes surveillance images, detects objects of interest, determines their states by comparing with trigger conditions, and triggers appropriate actions without human intervention,实现 complete automation while maintaining system simplicity through integrated software processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The server arrangement performs multiple functions within a single system: acquiring surveillance data, processing images, detecting objects of interest, determining object states, comparing with trigger conditions, and triggering actions. This multi-functionality achieves high automation capability while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If passive surveillance systems are used, then system complexity is reduced, but responsiveness to events deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidresponsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The surveillance system implements active feedback mechanisms. The server arrangement continuously monitors surveillance images, compares detected object states against predefined trigger conditions, and automatically triggers actions when conditions are met. This closed-loop feedback system ensures immediate responsiveness to events while maintaining manageable complexity through algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares trigger conditions and action protocols in advance. When surveillance data is acquired, the server arrangement immediately compares object states against pre-defined trigger conditions and executes predetermined actions, eliminating decision delays and ensuring rapid responsiveness to critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11210529B2Automated surveillance system and method therefor
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 DARVIS INC
  • US11210529B2 patent drawing
  • US11210529B2 patent drawing
  • US11210529B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including a server arrangement and a programming interface in communication with external applications are provided. The server arrangement (i) acquires data from sensors, (ii) analyzes the data to determine at least one object of interest in a surveillance area, (iii) determines type of the at least one object of interest, one or more attributes associated with the at least one object of interest and a geospatial location of the at least one object of interest, (iv) estimates a state of the at least one object of interest based on the type of the at least one object, one or more attributes and the geospatial location; (v) compares the estimated state with a defined set of trigger conditions associated with surveillance area, and (vi) determines at least one action to be taken in the surveillance area based on the estimated state of the at least one object of interest matching with at least one of the trigger conditions. The programming interface triggers an external application to perform a determined action to be taken when the estimated state matches with trigger conditions.