Automated System Synchronization Using Global Relative Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated systems face challenges in synchronizing electrical components efficiently, particularly in production lines and CNC machines, where precise timing is crucial for optimal operation, but existing methods like absolute time synchronization and EtherCat systems are imprecise and complex.

Innovation Solution

The use of global, relative time information as a common reference variable for synchronizing electrical components in an automated system, where the state change from a standby mode to an operating mode serves as the synchronization point, allowing components to coordinate without complex external verification and minimizing bandwidth usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If absolute time information is sent to all participants for synchronization, then a reference value for calculating local time is established, but the system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime synchronization precisionVSAvoidsynchronization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each electrical component independently determines its local time stamp by calculating the elapsed time since the reference variable using its own time counter, without requiring complex external verification or coordination from other components. The system serves itself through decentralized autonomous time calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential reference variable (global relative time information) needed for synchronization, removing unnecessary complex coordination mechanisms. By sending only the reference variable and letting each component independently calculate its own time stamp, the system eliminates redundant verification and coordination overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If position measurement using sensors is used to ensure processing coordination, then processing accuracy is improved, but processing speed decreases due to measurement time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing coordination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical sensor-based position measurement systems with a temporal synchronization mechanism using time counters and reference variables. Instead of mechanically measuring component positions with sensors, the system uses time information to coordinate processing, eliminating the time required for physical measurements while maintaining coordination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary synchronization by establishing a common reference variable before processing operations. Time counters are pre-synchronized using the reference variable, allowing components to operate in coordination without real-time sensor measurements during the actual processing, thus maintaining both accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If complex coordination and verification of multiple systems is performed for synchronization, then synchronization accuracy is improved, but the time and resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization accuracyVSAvoidsynchronization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential reference variable needed for synchronization, removing unnecessary complex coordination and verification steps. By using a single global relative time information as the reference variable and letting each component independently calculate its local time stamp, the system achieves synchronization with minimal time and resource expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If frequent time synchronization signals are transmitted via the signal network, then synchronization precision is maintained, but bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization precisionVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic cyclic transmission of process data combined with event-driven updates of the reference variable. Instead of continuous or frequent synchronization signals, the reference variable is updated periodically or event-driven (e.g., on state changes), and all components independently maintain their time stamps using these periodic updates, significantly reducing bandwidth consumption while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP2746892B1Automated system and method for synchronising an automated system
Publication Date: 2015.12.16 BAUMULLER NURNBERG GMBH
  • EP2746892B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to an automated system (2) with at least two interacting electrical components (8, 10, 12), each comprising a timer (22). The electrical components (8, 10, 12) are interconnected via a signal network (14) for cyclic process data transmission and are synchronized with each other using a global, relative time information (32) as a reference variable (34). The invention further relates to a method for synchronizing an automated system (2).